PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TARK vs. QLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TARK vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TARK vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
-27.41%41.00%-4.85%121.37%-73.35%
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
-13.35%30.36%42.82%117.72%-36.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TARK achieves a -27.41% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's -13.35% return.


TARK

1D
12.58%
1M
-16.10%
YTD
-27.41%
6M
-45.62%
1Y
56.77%
3Y*
11.75%
5Y*
10Y*

QLD

1D
6.72%
1M
-10.26%
YTD
-13.35%
6M
-11.03%
1Y
37.53%
3Y*
35.41%
5Y*
15.27%
10Y*
29.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TARK vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TARK has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TARK vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TARK
TARK Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
TARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TARK Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
TARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
TARK Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

QLD
QLD Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TARK vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TARKQLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

0.84

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.48

1.43

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.20

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

1.49

-0.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.03

4.88

-2.86

TARK vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TARK Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is comparable to the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TARK and QLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TARKQLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

0.84

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.15

0.53

-0.68

Correlation

The correlation between TARK and QLD is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TARK vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

TARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 41.32%, more than QLD's 0.19% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
41.32%30.00%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
0.19%0.17%0.25%0.33%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.06%0.02%0.21%0.11%

Drawdowns

TARK vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TARK drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TARK and QLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TARKQLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.82%

-83.13%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.57%

-25.13%

-32.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.23%

-20.10%

-32.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.46%

-18.30%

-33.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.38%

7.67%

+16.71%

Volatility

TARK vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) has a higher volatility of 25.43% compared to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) at 12.96%. This indicates that TARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TARKQLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.43%

12.96%

+12.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.64%

25.55%

+29.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

84.45%

44.91%

+39.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

91.55%

44.77%

+46.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.55%

44.47%

+47.08%