TARK vs. OOQB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TARK (Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF) and OOQB (Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TARK is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while OOQB is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Volatility Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TARK returned 48.05% vs -27.35% for OOQB. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TARK charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for OOQB.

Performance

TARK vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TARK achieves a -5.86% return, which is significantly higher than OOQB's -18.43% return.

TARK

• 1D: -4.26%
• 1M: -1.29%
• YTD: -5.86%
• 6M: -15.22%
• 1Y: 48.05%
• 3Y*: 20.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OOQB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -18.43%
• 6M: -24.99%
• 1Y: -27.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TARK vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF	-5.86%	8.04%
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	-18.43%	-13.30%

Correlation

The correlation between TARK and OOQB is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.70

The correlation between TARK and OOQB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TARK vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TARK

TARK Risk / Return Rank: 21
TARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
TARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
TARK Omega Ratio Rank: 23
TARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
TARK Martin Ratio Rank: 17

OOQB

OOQB Risk / Return Rank: 4
OOQB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
OOQB Omega Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TARK vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TARK	OOQB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.67	-0.53	+1.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	-0.50	+1.85
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	0.94	+0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.84	-0.51	+1.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.64	-0.91	+2.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TARK vs. OOQB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TARK Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is higher than the OOQB Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TARK and OOQB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TARK	OOQB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67	-0.53	+1.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.08	-0.41	+0.33

Drawdowns

TARK vs. OOQB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TARK drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, which is greater than OOQB's maximum drawdown of -53.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TARK and OOQB.

Drawdown Indicators

	TARK	OOQB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.82%	-53.44%	-24.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.57%	-53.44%	-4.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-65.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.05%	-43.69%	+5.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.98%	-23.26%	-27.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.31%	30.11%	-0.80%

Volatility

TARK vs. OOQB - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) has a higher volatility of 18.24% compared to Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) at 0.00%. This indicates that TARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OOQB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TARK	OOQB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.24%	0.00%	+18.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.96%	39.39%	+10.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.80%	51.57%	+20.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.58%	58.12%	+32.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	90.58%	58.12%	+32.46%

TARK vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TARK has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than OOQB's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

TARK vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison

TARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.86%, more than OOQB's 11.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	11.62%	9.53%	0.00%
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF	31.86%	30.00%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TARK and OOQB in my portfolio?

TARK and OOQB have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TARK or OOQB?

TARK has higher volatility (18.24%) compared to OOQB (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TARK dropped -77.82% vs OOQB's -53.44%.

Which ETF is better, TARK or OOQB?

On 1-year performance, TARK leads with 48.05% vs -27.35% for OOQB. On fees, OOQB is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, OOQB has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TARK or OOQB?

Over the 1-year period, TARK has performed better with a 48.05% return vs -27.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TARK or OOQB?

OOQB is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TARK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TARK or OOQB?

TARK has the higher dividend yield at 31.86%, compared with 11.62% for OOQB.

What is the main difference between TARK and OOQB?

TARK is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while OOQB is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: AXS and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TARK and 0.75% for OOQB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.