TAGS vs. BCD
TAGS (Teucrium Agricultural Fund) and BCD (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TAGS is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium TAGS Index, while BCD is a Commodities fund actively managed by Aberdeen. TAGS is passively managed, while BCD is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TAGS returned -1.51%/yr vs 11.98%/yr for BCD. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TAGS charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for BCD.
Performance
TAGS vs. BCD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAGS achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly lower than BCD's 20.45% return.
TAGS
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -5.48%
- YTD
- 6.11%
- 6M
- 4.04%
- 1Y
- -0.95%
- 3Y*
- -7.08%
- 5Y*
- -1.51%
- 10Y*
- -1.74%
BCD
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- 20.45%
- 6M
- 20.51%
- 1Y
- 31.80%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- 11.98%
- 10Y*
- —
TAGS vs. BCD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 6.11% | -8.76% | -14.57% | -6.11% | 16.25% | 27.05% | 8.19% | -4.53% | -7.10% | -10.55% |
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 20.45% | 15.71% | 6.20% | -7.58% | 18.38% | 31.87% | 4.76% | 7.34% | -8.65% | 3.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAGS and BCD is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2017 | 0.44 |
The correlation between TAGS and BCD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAGS vs. BCD — Risk / Return Rank
TAGS
BCD
TAGS vs. BCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAGS | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.43 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | 4.42 | -4.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.16 | 12.57 | -12.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAGS | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | 2.33 | -2.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | 0.78 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | 0.67 | -0.90 |
Drawdowns
TAGS vs. BCD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAGS drawdown since its inception was -76.40%, which is greater than BCD's maximum drawdown of -29.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGS and BCD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAGS | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.40% | -29.81% | -46.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.07% | -7.22% | -2.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.59% | -10.50% | -23.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.60% | -23.03% | -14.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.69% | -3.60% | -60.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.23% | -9.86% | -47.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.88% | 2.54% | +3.34% |
Volatility
TAGS vs. BCD - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) at 4.33%. This indicates that TAGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAGS | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 4.33% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.12% | 11.74% | -1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.61% | 13.72% | -1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 15.41% | +1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 13.90% | +4.14% |
TAGS vs. BCD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAGS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than BCD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
TAGS vs. BCD - Dividend Comparison
TAGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.29%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 14.29% | 17.21% | 3.60% | 4.51% | 5.21% | 8.30% | 1.29% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 0.07% |
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAGS and BCD have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TAGS has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to BCD (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAGS dropped -76.40% vs BCD's -29.81%.
On 5-year performance, BCD leads with 11.98% vs -1.51% for TAGS. On fees, TAGS is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, BCD has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BCD has performed better with a 11.98% return vs -1.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAGS is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for BCD.
BCD has the higher dividend yield at 14.29%, compared with 0.00% for TAGS.
TAGS is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while BCD is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for TAGS and 0.29% for BCD.
BCD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAGS and BCD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer