T vs. GIS
T (AT&T Inc.) and GIS (General Mills, Inc.) are both stocks. T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while GIS operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, T returned 2.10%/yr vs -2.58%/yr for GIS. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
T vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, T achieves a -7.04% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -15.22% return. Over the past 10 years, T has outperformed GIS with an annualized return of 2.10%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively lower -2.58% annualized return.
T
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- 6M
- -2.84%
- YTD
- -7.04%
- 1Y
- -13.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.35%
GIS
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 14.39%
- 6M
- -12.66%
- YTD
- -15.22%
- 1Y
- -20.32%
- 3Y*
- -17.57%
- 5Y*
- -4.99%
- 10Y*
- -2.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.23%
T vs. GIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T AT&T Inc. | -7.04% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -15.22% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between T and GIS is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1984 | 0.30 |
Fundamentals
T:
$152.52B
GIS:
$20.06B
T:
$3.05
GIS:
-$0.16
T:
1.25
GIS:
1.10
T:
$125.65B
GIS:
$18.42B
T:
$105.41B
GIS:
$6.19B
T:
$54.70B
GIS:
$300.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
T vs. GIS — Risk / Return Rank
T
GIS
T vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. (T) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| T | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.88 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | -0.59 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | -1.14 | +0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
T vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum T drawdown since its inception was -64.15%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -59.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T and GIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| T | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.15% | -59.63% | -4.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.89% | -34.48% | +5.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.89% | -53.45% | +24.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.01% | -59.63% | +27.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.35% | -59.63% | +17.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.57% | -52.03% | +30.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.74% | -10.38% | -5.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.94% | 17.80% | -4.86% |
Volatility
T vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AT&T Inc. (T) is 9.59%, while General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a volatility of 12.90%. This indicates that T experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| T | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.59% | 12.90% | -3.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.91% | 21.53% | -1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.72% | 26.43% | -2.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.38% | 21.90% | +2.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 22.42% | +1.50% |
Dividends
T vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than GIS's 6.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 6.49% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
T AT&T Inc. | 6.58% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
T vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
T and GIS have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIS has higher volatility (12.90%) compared to T (9.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, T dropped -64.15% vs GIS's -59.63%.
T currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for T and GIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer