SZNE vs. VUG
SZNE (Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - SZNE tracks the Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index while VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SZNE returned 1.44%/yr vs 15.11%/yr for VUG. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SZNE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
SZNE vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SZNE having a 9.68% return and VUG slightly lower at 9.49%.
SZNE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 9.68%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 12.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.38%
- 5Y*
- 1.44%
- 10Y*
- —
VUG
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.26%
SZNE vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 9.68% | -3.44% | 2.05% | 6.53% | -12.33% | 26.36% | 4.03% | 35.75% | -6.90% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 9.49% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -13.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between SZNE and VUG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SZNE and VUG has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SZNE vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SZNE
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
SZNE
VUG
Technology
SZNE
VUG
Industrials
SZNE
VUG
Basic Materials
SZNE
VUG
Communication Services
SZNE
VUG
Energy
SZNE
VUG
Utilities
SZNE
VUG
Consumer Defensive
SZNE
-
VUG
Financial Services
SZNE
-
VUG
Healthcare
SZNE
-
VUG
Real Estate
SZNE
-
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SZNE vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
SZNE
VUG
SZNE vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SZNE | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.31 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 1.69 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.14 | 5.92 | -0.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SZNE | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 1.77 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.68 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.62 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
SZNE vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SZNE drawdown since its inception was -39.79%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZNE and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SZNE | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.79% | -50.68% | +10.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.92% | -16.53% | +6.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.92% | -22.85% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.92% | -35.61% | +12.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -1.51% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.33% | -7.09% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 4.71% | -1.67% |
Volatility
SZNE vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) is 2.73%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that SZNE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SZNE | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 3.83% | -1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | 12.11% | -0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.80% | 15.84% | -1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 22.22% | -5.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.10% | 21.44% | -1.34% |
SZNE vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SZNE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SZNE vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 1.37% | 1.47% | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 0.79% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SZNE and VUG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VUG has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to SZNE (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SZNE dropped -39.79% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 5-year performance, VUG leads with 15.11% vs 1.44% for SZNE. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SZNE has been the lower-risk option at 2.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VUG has performed better with a 15.11% return vs 1.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SZNE.
SZNE has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.
SZNE tracks Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SZNE and 0.03% for VUG.
VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SZNE and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer