PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SZNE vs. BDGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SZNE vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SZNE

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

BDGS

1D
0.56%
1M
-0.71%
6M
4.08%
YTD
4.35%
1Y
10.14%
3Y*
13.19%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$35.83K$93.96K$183.58K

SZNE vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SZNE
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF
9.68%-3.44%2.05%2.15%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
4.35%10.61%19.07%8.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SZNE and BDGS is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023

0.44

The correlation between SZNE and BDGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.46 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SZNE vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SZNE
BDGS

Technology

19.4%
38.9%

Financial Services

8.1%
9.3%

Industrials

7.8%
6.8%

Healthcare

5.1%
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
12.2%

Energy

3.8%
2.4%

Communication Services

3.7%
15.1%

Real Estate

2.8%
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
3.6%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.3%

Utilities

1.0%
1.8%

Technology

SZNE
19.4%
BDGS
38.9%

Financial Services

SZNE
8.1%
BDGS
9.3%

Industrials

SZNE
7.8%
BDGS
6.8%

Healthcare

SZNE
5.1%
BDGS
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SZNE
5.1%
BDGS
12.2%

Energy

SZNE
3.8%
BDGS
2.4%

Communication Services

SZNE
3.7%
BDGS
15.1%

Real Estate

SZNE
2.8%
BDGS
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

SZNE
2.6%
BDGS
3.6%

Basic Materials

SZNE
1.8%
BDGS
1.3%

Utilities

SZNE
1.0%
BDGS
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SZNE vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SZNE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BDGS
BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SZNE vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SZNEBDGSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.70

SZNE vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SZNE vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SZNEBDGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

Volatility

SZNE vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SZNEBDGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.30%

SZNE vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SZNE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

SZNE vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than BDGS's 0.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
0.53%0.55%1.81%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SZNE
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF
1.23%1.47%1.20%1.21%1.11%0.79%1.37%0.90%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


SZNE and BDGS have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SZNE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SZNE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

SZNE has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.53% for BDGS.

SZNE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BDGS is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SZNE and 0.87% for BDGS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SZNE and BDGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer