PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SZNE vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SZNE vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SZNE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSP

1D
-0.34%
1M
1.51%
YTD
9.94%
6M
9.07%
1Y
18.97%
3Y*
14.87%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
12.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SZNE vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SZNE
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF
9.68%-3.44%2.05%6.53%-12.33%26.36%4.03%35.75%-7.01%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
9.94%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%28.91%-11.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SZNE and RSP is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2018

0.85

The correlation between SZNE and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

SZNE vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SZNE
RSP

Consumer Cyclical

29.7%
10.0%

Technology

25.3%
20.9%

Industrials

23.6%
14.2%

Basic Materials

20.3%
3.9%

Communication Services

0.5%
3.9%

Energy

0.3%
4.0%

Utilities

0.3%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.4%

Financial Services

-

13.9%

Healthcare

-

11.1%

Real Estate

-

6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SZNE
29.7%
RSP
10.0%

Technology

SZNE
25.3%
RSP
20.9%

Industrials

SZNE
23.6%
RSP
14.2%

Basic Materials

SZNE
20.3%
RSP
3.9%

Communication Services

SZNE
0.5%
RSP
3.9%

Energy

SZNE
0.3%
RSP
4.0%

Utilities

SZNE
0.3%
RSP
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

SZNE

-

RSP
6.4%

Financial Services

SZNE

-

RSP
13.9%

Healthcare

SZNE

-

RSP
11.1%

Real Estate

SZNE

-

RSP
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SZNE vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SZNE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SZNE vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SZNERSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.17

SZNE vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SZNE vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SZNERSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

Volatility

SZNE vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SZNERSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

SZNE vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SZNE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

SZNE vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than RSP's 1.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.53%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%
SZNE
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF
1.23%1.47%1.20%1.21%1.11%0.79%1.37%0.90%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SZNE and RSP have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SZNE.

RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 1.23% for SZNE.

SZNE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. SZNE tracks Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SZNE and 0.20% for RSP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SZNE and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer