SZNE vs. RSP
SZNE (Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SZNE is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SZNE returned 1.44%/yr vs 8.33%/yr for RSP. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SZNE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.
Performance
SZNE vs. RSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SZNE having a 9.68% return and RSP slightly higher at 9.70%.
SZNE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 9.68%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 12.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.38%
- 5Y*
- 1.44%
- 10Y*
- —
RSP
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 19.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
SZNE vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 9.68% | -3.44% | 2.05% | 6.53% | -12.33% | 26.36% | 4.03% | 35.75% | -6.90% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 9.70% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 12.66% | 28.91% | -11.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SZNE and RSP is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018 | 0.85 |
The correlation between SZNE and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
SZNE vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SZNE
RSP
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
SZNE
RSP
Technology
SZNE
RSP
Industrials
SZNE
RSP
Basic Materials
SZNE
RSP
Communication Services
SZNE
RSP
Energy
SZNE
RSP
Utilities
SZNE
RSP
Consumer Defensive
SZNE
-
RSP
Financial Services
SZNE
-
RSP
Healthcare
SZNE
-
RSP
Real Estate
SZNE
-
RSP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SZNE vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank
SZNE
RSP
SZNE vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SZNE | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 1.70 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 2.47 | -0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.30 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 2.49 | -0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.14 | 9.48 | -4.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SZNE | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 1.70 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.52 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.57 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
SZNE vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SZNE drawdown since its inception was -39.79%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZNE and RSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SZNE | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.79% | -59.92% | +20.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.92% | -7.85% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.92% | -17.81% | -5.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.92% | -21.38% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -0.38% | -0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.33% | -6.65% | -0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 2.06% | +0.98% |
Volatility
SZNE vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.56%. This indicates that SZNE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SZNE | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 2.56% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | 8.29% | +3.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.80% | 11.56% | +3.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 16.18% | +0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.10% | 18.35% | +1.75% |
SZNE vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SZNE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
SZNE vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison
SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than RSP's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.49% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 1.37% | 1.47% | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 0.79% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SZNE and RSP have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SZNE has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to RSP (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SZNE dropped -39.79% vs RSP's -59.92%.
On 5-year performance, RSP leads with 8.33% vs 1.44% for SZNE. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RSP has performed better with a 8.33% return vs 1.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SZNE.
RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 1.37% for SZNE.
SZNE is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. SZNE tracks Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SZNE and 0.20% for RSP.
RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SZNE and RSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer