PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SZNE vs. QDPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SZNE vs. QDPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SZNE achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly lower than QDPL's 10.40% return.


SZNE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.07%
YTD
9.68%
6M
10.60%
1Y
12.73%
3Y*
3.38%
5Y*
1.44%
10Y*

QDPL

1D
-0.65%
1M
5.23%
YTD
10.40%
6M
10.54%
1Y
26.37%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SZNE vs. QDPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SZNE
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF
9.68%-3.44%2.05%6.53%-12.33%5.22%
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
10.40%16.52%22.83%23.66%-16.25%8.32%

Correlation

The correlation between SZNE and QDPL is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between SZNE and QDPL has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SZNE vs. QDPL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SZNE
QDPL

Consumer Cyclical

29.7%
8.4%

Technology

25.3%
27.6%

Industrials

23.6%
6.3%

Basic Materials

20.3%
1.4%

Communication Services

0.5%
8.5%

Energy

0.3%
2.4%

Utilities

0.3%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.0%

Financial Services

-

10.3%

Healthcare

-

7.6%

Real Estate

-

1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SZNE
29.7%
QDPL
8.4%

Technology

SZNE
25.3%
QDPL
27.6%

Industrials

SZNE
23.6%
QDPL
6.3%

Basic Materials

SZNE
20.3%
QDPL
1.4%

Communication Services

SZNE
0.5%
QDPL
8.5%

Energy

SZNE
0.3%
QDPL
2.4%

Utilities

SZNE
0.3%
QDPL
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

SZNE

-

QDPL
4.0%

Financial Services

SZNE

-

QDPL
10.3%

Healthcare

SZNE

-

QDPL
7.6%

Real Estate

SZNE

-

QDPL
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SZNE vs. QDPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SZNE
SZNE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SZNE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SZNE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SZNE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SZNE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SZNE Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

QDPL
QDPL Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
QDPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDPL Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
QDPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDPL Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SZNE vs. QDPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SZNEQDPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.41

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

3.06

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.14

14.37

-9.23

SZNE vs. QDPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SZNE Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the QDPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SZNE and QDPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SZNEQDPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

2.23

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.83

-0.49

Drawdowns

SZNE vs. QDPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SZNE drawdown since its inception was -39.79%, which is greater than QDPL's maximum drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZNE and QDPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SZNEQDPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.79%

-22.59%

-17.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-8.65%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.92%

-17.75%

-5.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-0.65%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-5.14%

-2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

1.84%

+1.20%

Volatility

SZNE vs. QDPL - Volatility Comparison

Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) have volatilities of 2.73% and 2.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SZNEQDPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

2.69%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.47%

9.00%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.80%

11.89%

+2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.98%

15.01%

+1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.10%

15.01%

+5.09%

SZNE vs. QDPL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SZNE and QDPL have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

SZNE vs. QDPL - Dividend Comparison

SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than QDPL's 5.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
5.05%4.84%5.43%6.30%7.27%2.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SZNE
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF
1.37%1.47%1.20%1.21%1.11%0.79%1.37%0.90%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


SZNE and QDPL have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SZNE has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to QDPL (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SZNE dropped -39.79% vs QDPL's -22.59%.

On 3-year performance, QDPL leads with 20.64% vs 3.38% for SZNE. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QDPL has performed better with a 20.64% return vs 3.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SZNE and QDPL have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

QDPL has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 1.37% for SZNE.

SZNE is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QDPL is Large Cap Blend Equities.

QDPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SZNE and QDPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer