SZNE vs. QDPL
SZNE (Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF) and QDPL (Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SZNE is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while QDPL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Pacer. SZNE is passively managed, while QDPL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SZNE returned 3.38%/yr vs 20.64%/yr for QDPL. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
SZNE vs. QDPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SZNE achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly lower than QDPL's 10.40% return.
SZNE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 9.68%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 12.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.38%
- 5Y*
- 1.44%
- 10Y*
- —
QDPL
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- 10.40%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 26.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SZNE vs. QDPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 9.68% | -3.44% | 2.05% | 6.53% | -12.33% | 5.22% |
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 10.40% | 16.52% | 22.83% | 23.66% | -16.25% | 8.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between SZNE and QDPL is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SZNE and QDPL has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SZNE vs. QDPL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SZNE
QDPL
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
SZNE
QDPL
Technology
SZNE
QDPL
Industrials
SZNE
QDPL
Basic Materials
SZNE
QDPL
Communication Services
SZNE
QDPL
Energy
SZNE
QDPL
Utilities
SZNE
QDPL
Consumer Defensive
SZNE
-
QDPL
Financial Services
SZNE
-
QDPL
Healthcare
SZNE
-
QDPL
Real Estate
SZNE
-
QDPL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SZNE vs. QDPL — Risk / Return Rank
SZNE
QDPL
SZNE vs. QDPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SZNE | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.41 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 3.06 | -1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.14 | 14.37 | -9.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SZNE | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 2.23 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.83 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
SZNE vs. QDPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SZNE drawdown since its inception was -39.79%, which is greater than QDPL's maximum drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZNE and QDPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SZNE | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.79% | -22.59% | -17.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.92% | -8.65% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.92% | -17.75% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -0.65% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.33% | -5.14% | -2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 1.84% | +1.20% |
Volatility
SZNE vs. QDPL - Volatility Comparison
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) have volatilities of 2.73% and 2.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SZNE | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 2.69% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | 9.00% | +2.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.80% | 11.89% | +2.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 15.01% | +1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.10% | 15.01% | +5.09% |
SZNE vs. QDPL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SZNE and QDPL have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
SZNE vs. QDPL - Dividend Comparison
SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than QDPL's 5.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 5.05% | 4.84% | 5.43% | 6.30% | 7.27% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 1.37% | 1.47% | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 0.79% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SZNE and QDPL have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SZNE has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to QDPL (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SZNE dropped -39.79% vs QDPL's -22.59%.
On 3-year performance, QDPL leads with 20.64% vs 3.38% for SZNE. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QDPL has performed better with a 20.64% return vs 3.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SZNE and QDPL have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
QDPL has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 1.37% for SZNE.
SZNE is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QDPL is Large Cap Blend Equities.
QDPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SZNE and QDPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer