SZNE vs. QDPL
SZNE (Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF) and QDPL (Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from Pacer - SZNE tracks the Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index while QDPL tracks the Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Index - Series 400. Both are passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
SZNE vs. QDPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SZNE
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDPL
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- 6M
- 9.06%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 21.30%
- 3Y*
- 19.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SZNE vs. QDPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 9.68% | -3.44% | 2.05% | 6.53% | -12.33% | 4.71% |
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 10.75% | 16.52% | 22.83% | 23.66% | -16.25% | 7.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SZNE and QDPL is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SZNE and QDPL has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SZNE vs. QDPL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SZNE
QDPL
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Technology
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
SZNE
QDPL
Industrials
SZNE
QDPL
Energy
SZNE
QDPL
Technology
SZNE
QDPL
Healthcare
SZNE
QDPL
Utilities
SZNE
QDPL
Consumer Cyclical
SZNE
QDPL
Communication Services
SZNE
QDPL
Real Estate
SZNE
QDPL
Basic Materials
SZNE
QDPL
Consumer Defensive
SZNE
QDPL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SZNE vs. QDPL — Risk / Return Rank
SZNE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QDPL
SZNE vs. QDPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SZNE | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.40 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.61 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SZNE vs. QDPL - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SZNE | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -22.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.33% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -5.08% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.96% | — |
Volatility
SZNE vs. QDPL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SZNE | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.13% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 12.46% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 15.03% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 15.03% | — |
SZNE vs. QDPL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SZNE and QDPL have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
SZNE vs. QDPL - Dividend Comparison
SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than QDPL's 4.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 4.52% | 4.84% | 5.43% | 6.30% | 7.27% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 0.79% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SZNE and QDPL have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SZNE and QDPL have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
QDPL has the higher dividend yield at 4.52%, compared with 1.23% for SZNE.
SZNE tracks Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while QDPL tracks Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Index - Series 400.
Find the right allocation for SZNE and QDPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer