SZNE vs. CCOR
SZNE (Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. SZNE is passively managed, while CCOR is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SZNE returned 1.44%/yr vs -2.56%/yr for CCOR. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SZNE charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.
Performance
SZNE vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SZNE achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's -3.71% return.
SZNE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 9.68%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 12.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.38%
- 5Y*
- 1.44%
- 10Y*
- —
CCOR
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- YTD
- -3.71%
- 6M
- -4.87%
- 1Y
- -5.97%
- 3Y*
- -2.34%
- 5Y*
- -2.56%
- 10Y*
- —
SZNE vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 9.68% | -3.44% | 2.05% | 6.53% | -12.33% | 26.36% | 4.03% | 35.75% | -6.90% |
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | -3.71% | 3.52% | -5.70% | -11.92% | 2.51% | 9.90% | 4.07% | 6.03% | 8.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between SZNE and CCOR is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018 | 0.33 |
The correlation between SZNE and CCOR shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SZNE vs. CCOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SZNE
CCOR
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
SZNE
CCOR
Technology
SZNE
CCOR
Industrials
SZNE
CCOR
Basic Materials
SZNE
CCOR
Communication Services
SZNE
CCOR
Energy
SZNE
CCOR
Utilities
SZNE
CCOR
Consumer Defensive
SZNE
-
CCOR
Financial Services
SZNE
-
CCOR
Healthcare
SZNE
-
CCOR
Real Estate
SZNE
-
CCOR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SZNE vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank
SZNE
CCOR
SZNE vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SZNE | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.87 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | -0.69 | +2.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.14 | -1.59 | +6.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SZNE | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | -0.87 | +1.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | -0.23 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.11 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
SZNE vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SZNE drawdown since its inception was -39.79%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZNE and CCOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SZNE | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.79% | -22.99% | -16.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.92% | -8.75% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.92% | -12.31% | -10.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.92% | -22.99% | +0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -20.03% | +18.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.33% | -7.29% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 3.77% | -0.73% |
Volatility
SZNE vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 1.78%. This indicates that SZNE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SZNE | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 1.78% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | 4.96% | +6.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.80% | 6.93% | +7.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 11.10% | +5.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.10% | 10.75% | +9.35% |
SZNE vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SZNE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
SZNE vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison
SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than CCOR's 1.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | 1.11% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.02% | 1.50% | 0.73% | 1.53% | 0.89% |
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 1.37% | 1.47% | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 0.79% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 0.68% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SZNE and CCOR have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SZNE has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to CCOR (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SZNE dropped -39.79% vs CCOR's -22.99%.
On 5-year performance, SZNE leads with 1.44% vs -2.56% for CCOR. On fees, SZNE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SZNE has performed better with a 1.44% return vs -2.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SZNE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.
SZNE has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 1.11% for CCOR.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Core Alternative Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SZNE and 1.09% for CCOR.
SZNE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SZNE and CCOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer