SXQG vs. ILCB
SXQG (ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF) and ILCB (iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. SXQG is actively managed, while ILCB is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SXQG returned 5.59%/yr vs 13.45%/yr for ILCB. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SXQG charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ILCB.
Performance
SXQG vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXQG achieves a -2.67% return, which is significantly lower than ILCB's 11.12% return.
SXQG
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- -2.67%
- 6M
- -2.94%
- 1Y
- -0.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- 5.59%
- 10Y*
- —
ILCB
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 5.29%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- 1Y
- 28.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.45%
- 10Y*
- 15.00%
SXQG vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXQG ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF | -2.67% | 4.43% | 18.77% | 28.32% | -23.93% | 12.62% |
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 11.12% | 17.70% | 24.96% | 26.91% | -19.48% | 14.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXQG and ILCB is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2021 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SXQG and ILCB shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SXQG vs. ILCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SXQG
ILCB
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SXQG
ILCB
Communication Services
SXQG
ILCB
Healthcare
SXQG
ILCB
Consumer Defensive
SXQG
ILCB
Financial Services
SXQG
ILCB
Consumer Cyclical
SXQG
ILCB
Industrials
SXQG
ILCB
Energy
SXQG
ILCB
Basic Materials
SXQG
ILCB
Real Estate
SXQG
-
ILCB
Utilities
SXQG
-
ILCB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXQG vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank
SXQG
ILCB
SXQG vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXQG | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.42 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 3.10 | -3.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.11 | 14.24 | -14.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXQG | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 | 2.35 | -2.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.79 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.64 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
SXQG vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXQG drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, smaller than the maximum ILCB drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXQG and ILCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXQG | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.97% | -51.53% | +17.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.03% | -9.09% | -4.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.53% | -19.05% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.97% | -25.47% | -8.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.52% | -0.67% | -4.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.12% | -6.24% | -3.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 1.97% | +2.94% |
Volatility
SXQG vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison
ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) at 2.88%. This indicates that SXQG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXQG | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 2.88% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.03% | 9.10% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.68% | 12.02% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 17.13% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 18.16% | -0.19% |
SXQG vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXQG has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SXQG vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison
SXQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than ILCB's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 0.97% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.65% | 1.16% | 1.26% | 2.25% | 2.17% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 2.44% |
SXQG ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SXQG and ILCB have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SXQG has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to ILCB (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SXQG dropped -33.97% vs ILCB's -51.53%.
On 5-year performance, ILCB leads with 13.45% vs 5.59% for SXQG. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ILCB has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ILCB has performed better with a 13.45% return vs 5.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SXQG.
ILCB has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.07% for SXQG.
They also come from different issuers: Meridian and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SXQG and 0.03% for ILCB.
ILCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SXQG and ILCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer