SXQG vs. BIBL
SXQG (ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF) and BIBL (Inspire 100 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. SXQG is actively managed, while BIBL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SXQG returned 5.59%/yr vs 10.11%/yr for BIBL. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SXQG charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BIBL.
Performance
SXQG vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXQG achieves a -2.67% return, which is significantly lower than BIBL's 23.84% return.
SXQG
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- -2.67%
- 6M
- -2.94%
- 1Y
- -0.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- 5.59%
- 10Y*
- —
BIBL
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 5.68%
- YTD
- 23.84%
- 6M
- 22.77%
- 1Y
- 40.34%
- 3Y*
- 22.20%
- 5Y*
- 10.11%
- 10Y*
- —
SXQG vs. BIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXQG ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF | -2.67% | 4.43% | 18.77% | 28.32% | -23.93% | 12.62% |
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF | 23.84% | 17.27% | 12.49% | 17.87% | -23.26% | 13.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXQG and BIBL is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2021 | 0.84 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SXQG and BIBL has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SXQG vs. BIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SXQG
BIBL
Technology
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SXQG
BIBL
Communication Services
SXQG
BIBL
-
Healthcare
SXQG
BIBL
Consumer Defensive
SXQG
BIBL
Financial Services
SXQG
BIBL
Consumer Cyclical
SXQG
BIBL
Industrials
SXQG
BIBL
Energy
SXQG
BIBL
Basic Materials
SXQG
BIBL
Real Estate
SXQG
-
BIBL
Utilities
SXQG
-
BIBL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXQG vs. BIBL — Risk / Return Rank
SXQG
BIBL
SXQG vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXQG | BIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.45 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 4.53 | -4.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.11 | 19.63 | -19.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXQG | BIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 | 2.62 | -2.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.52 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.63 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
SXQG vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXQG drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, smaller than the maximum BIBL drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXQG and BIBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXQG | BIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.97% | -36.12% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.03% | -8.94% | -5.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.53% | -20.60% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.97% | -30.85% | -3.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.52% | 0.00% | -5.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.12% | -7.04% | -3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 2.06% | +2.85% |
Volatility
SXQG vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) is 3.09%, while Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that SXQG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXQG | BIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 4.62% | -1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.03% | 12.63% | -3.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.68% | 15.47% | -3.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 19.59% | -1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 21.08% | -3.11% |
SXQG vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXQG has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SXQG vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison
SXQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than BIBL's 0.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF | 0.95% | 1.01% | 0.92% | 1.02% | 0.98% | 17.87% | 1.67% | 1.30% | 1.49% | 0.31% |
SXQG ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SXQG and BIBL have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIBL has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to SXQG (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SXQG dropped -33.97% vs BIBL's -36.12%.
On 5-year performance, BIBL leads with 10.11% vs 5.59% for SXQG. On fees, BIBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SXQG has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BIBL has performed better with a 10.11% return vs 5.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SXQG.
BIBL has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.07% for SXQG.
They also come from different issuers: Meridian and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SXQG and 0.35% for BIBL.
BIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SXQG and BIBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer