SWK vs. CL
SWK (Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.) and CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) are both stocks. SWK operates in Tools & Accessories (Industrials), while CL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, SWK returned -0.15%/yr vs 4.62%/yr for CL. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SWK vs. CL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SWK having a 15.04% return and CL slightly lower at 14.60%. Over the past 10 years, SWK has underperformed CL with an annualized return of -0.15%, while CL has yielded a comparatively higher 4.62% annualized return.
SWK
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 12.48%
- YTD
- 15.04%
- 6M
- 12.91%
- 1Y
- 33.97%
- 3Y*
- 1.97%
- 5Y*
- -13.22%
- 10Y*
- -0.15%
CL
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 14.60%
- 6M
- 15.59%
- 1Y
- 1.61%
- 3Y*
- 8.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.79%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
SWK vs. CL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWK Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 15.04% | -3.17% | -15.19% | 35.55% | -58.92% | 7.28% | 9.73% | 41.18% | -28.13% | 50.50% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 14.60% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWK and CL is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.27 |
The correlation between SWK and CL shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SWK:
$2.65
CL:
$2.58
SWK:
31.61
CL:
34.68
SWK:
0.84
CL:
3.48
SWK:
$15.13B
CL:
$20.80B
SWK:
$4.52B
CL:
$12.49B
SWK:
$1.39B
CL:
$3.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWK vs. CL — Risk / Return Rank
SWK
CL
SWK vs. CL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWK | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.01 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | -0.08 | +1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.54 | -0.14 | +2.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWK vs. CL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWK drawdown since its inception was -71.31%, which is greater than CL's maximum drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWK and CL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWK | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.31% | -58.91% | -12.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.14% | -18.64% | -7.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.31% | -29.05% | -19.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.86% | -29.05% | -40.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.31% | -29.05% | -42.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.51% | -14.31% | -40.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.46% | -11.24% | -8.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.75% | 11.35% | +0.40% |
Volatility
SWK vs. CL - Volatility Comparison
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) has a higher volatility of 10.14% compared to Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) at 8.32%. This indicates that SWK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWK | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.14% | 8.32% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.24% | 17.28% | +9.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.82% | 21.83% | +15.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.71% | 18.81% | +18.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.69% | 19.75% | +16.94% |
Dividends
SWK vs. CL - Dividend Comparison
SWK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than CL's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.34% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
SWK Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 3.97% | 4.44% | 4.06% | 3.28% | 4.23% | 1.58% | 1.56% | 1.63% | 2.15% | 1.43% | 1.97% | 2.01% |
Financials
SWK vs. CL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Colgate-Palmolive Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SWK vs. CL - Profitability Comparison
SWK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.22B and revenue of 3.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.2%.
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.23B and revenue of 5.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
SWK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported an operating income of 366.80M and revenue of 3.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
SWK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported a net income of 158.20M and revenue of 3.68B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 646.00M and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SWK and CL have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWK has higher volatility (10.14%) compared to CL (8.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWK dropped -71.31% vs CL's -58.91%.
SWK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWK and CL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer