SWK vs. VFC
Compare and contrast key facts about Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) and V.F. Corporation (VFC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SWK or VFC.
Correlation
The correlation between SWK and VFC is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SWK vs. VFC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SWK:
-0.51
VFC:
0.17
SWK:
-0.56
VFC:
0.70
SWK:
0.93
VFC:
1.08
SWK:
-0.27
VFC:
0.11
SWK:
-1.03
VFC:
0.72
SWK:
15.94%
VFC:
13.03%
SWK:
31.94%
VFC:
56.57%
SWK:
-66.45%
VFC:
-86.04%
SWK:
-60.45%
VFC:
-80.49%
Fundamentals
SWK:
$11.90B
VFC:
$6.39B
SWK:
$1.89
VFC:
-$0.37
SWK:
1.37
VFC:
0.14
SWK:
$11.50B
VFC:
$7.50B
SWK:
$3.44B
VFC:
$4.04B
SWK:
$1.01B
VFC:
$466.30M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWK achieves a -3.18% return, which is significantly higher than VFC's -23.26% return. Over the past 10 years, SWK has outperformed VFC with an annualized return of 0.22%, while VFC has yielded a comparatively lower -11.11% annualized return.
SWK
-3.18%
-7.54%
-28.19%
-15.50%
-1.40%
0.22%
VFC
-23.26%
-32.34%
-15.15%
17.18%
-16.92%
-11.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SWK vs. VFC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SWK
VFC
SWK vs. VFC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) and V.F. Corporation (VFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SWK vs. VFC - Dividend Comparison
SWK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than VFC's 2.20% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWK Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 4.25% | 4.06% | 3.28% | 4.23% | 1.58% | 1.56% | 1.63% | 2.15% | 1.43% | 1.97% | 2.01% | 2.12% |
VFC V.F. Corporation | 2.20% | 1.68% | 5.27% | 7.28% | 2.69% | 2.26% | 1.91% | 2.65% | 2.33% | 2.87% | 2.14% | 1.48% |
Drawdowns
SWK vs. VFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWK drawdown since its inception was -66.45%, smaller than the maximum VFC drawdown of -86.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWK and VFC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SWK vs. VFC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) is 10.29%, while V.F. Corporation (VFC) has a volatility of 20.22%. This indicates that SWK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SWK vs. VFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and V.F. Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities