SWK vs. VFC
SWK (Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.) and VFC (V.F. Corporation) are both stocks. SWK operates in Tools & Accessories (Industrials), while VFC operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, SWK returned -1.00%/yr vs -9.18%/yr for VFC. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SWK vs. VFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWK achieves a 7.73% return, which is significantly higher than VFC's -7.09% return. Over the past 10 years, SWK has outperformed VFC with an annualized return of -1.00%, while VFC has yielded a comparatively lower -9.18% annualized return.
SWK
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 7.73%
- 6M
- 12.32%
- 1Y
- 29.69%
- 3Y*
- 3.04%
- 5Y*
- -15.03%
- 10Y*
- -1.00%
VFC
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -12.10%
- YTD
- -7.09%
- 6M
- -4.73%
- 1Y
- 39.82%
- 3Y*
- 0.15%
- 5Y*
- -24.27%
- 10Y*
- -9.18%
SWK vs. VFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWK Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 7.73% | -3.17% | -15.19% | 35.55% | -58.92% | 7.28% | 9.73% | 41.18% | -28.13% | 50.50% |
VFC V.F. Corporation | -7.09% | -13.83% | 16.64% | -28.51% | -60.38% | -12.05% | -12.00% | 51.70% | -1.33% | 42.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWK and VFC is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 1985 | 0.40 |
The correlation between SWK and VFC shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SWK:
$2.65
VFC:
$0.57
SWK:
29.92
VFC:
29.45
SWK:
0.79
VFC:
0.69
SWK:
$15.13B
VFC:
$9.58B
SWK:
$4.52B
VFC:
$5.16B
SWK:
$1.39B
VFC:
$961.05M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWK vs. VFC — Risk / Return Rank
SWK
VFC
SWK vs. VFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) and V.F. Corporation (VFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWK | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 0.82 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.35 | 1.40 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.17 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 1.46 | -0.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.31 | 3.50 | -1.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWK | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 0.82 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.40 | -0.46 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 | -0.21 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.23 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
SWK vs. VFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWK drawdown since its inception was -71.31%, smaller than the maximum VFC drawdown of -88.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWK and VFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWK | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.31% | -88.41% | +17.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.14% | -25.57% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.31% | -63.66% | +15.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.25% | -86.78% | +16.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.31% | -88.41% | +17.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.40% | -79.64% | +22.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.44% | -21.62% | +2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.59% | 10.65% | +0.94% |
Volatility
SWK vs. VFC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) is 10.13%, while V.F. Corporation (VFC) has a volatility of 13.38%. This indicates that SWK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWK | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 13.38% | -3.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.58% | 31.50% | -4.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.22% | 48.79% | -11.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.54% | 53.48% | -15.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.61% | 44.89% | -8.28% |
Dividends
SWK vs. VFC - Dividend Comparison
SWK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than VFC's 2.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWK Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 4.18% | 4.44% | 4.06% | 3.28% | 4.23% | 1.58% | 1.56% | 1.63% | 2.15% | 1.43% | 1.97% | 2.01% |
VFC V.F. Corporation | 2.15% | 1.99% | 1.68% | 5.27% | 7.28% | 2.69% | 2.26% | 1.91% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 2.87% | 2.14% |
Financials
SWK vs. VFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and V.F. Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SWK vs. VFC - Profitability Comparison
SWK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.22B and revenue of 3.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.2%.
VFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, V.F. Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 2.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.6%.
SWK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported an operating income of 366.80M and revenue of 3.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
VFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, V.F. Corporation reported an operating income of 289.05M and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.
SWK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported a net income of 158.20M and revenue of 3.68B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.
VFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, V.F. Corporation reported a net income of 300.85M and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SWK and VFC have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFC has higher volatility (13.38%) compared to SWK (10.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWK dropped -71.31% vs VFC's -88.41%.
VFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWK and VFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer