SWASX vs. SNXFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX).
SWASX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on May 30, 2007. SNXFX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Schwab 1000 Index. It was launched on Apr 2, 1991.
Performance
SWASX vs. SNXFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWASX vs. SNXFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWASX Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ | -0.59% | 11.33% | 1.42% | 8.49% | -25.10% | 25.32% | -12.10% | 27.81% | -7.66% | 14.38% |
SNXFX Schwab 1000 Index Fund | -6.94% | 17.23% | 24.46% | 26.53% | -19.46% | 26.10% | 20.71% | 31.43% | -5.04% | 21.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWASX achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly higher than SNXFX's -6.94% return. Over the past 10 years, SWASX has underperformed SNXFX with an annualized return of 3.10%, while SNXFX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.39% annualized return.
SWASX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -10.76%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- 9.61%
- 3Y*
- 6.09%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- 3.10%
SNXFX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -7.77%
- YTD
- -6.94%
- 6M
- -4.75%
- 1Y
- 14.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWASX vs. SNXFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWASX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SNXFX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SWASX vs. SNXFX — Risk / Return Rank
SWASX
SNXFX
SWASX vs. SNXFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWASX | SNXFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 0.82 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.07 | 1.27 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.19 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 1.02 | -0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.80 | 4.97 | -1.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWASX | SNXFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 0.82 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.61 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.72 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.55 | -0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWASX and SNXFX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWASX vs. SNXFX - Dividend Comparison
SWASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than SNXFX's 1.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWASX Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ | 2.23% | 3.11% | 3.32% | 3.29% | 3.00% | 3.71% | 2.94% | 7.38% | 4.24% | 3.32% | 4.67% | 3.00% |
SNXFX Schwab 1000 Index Fund | 1.56% | 1.45% | 1.23% | 1.41% | 1.61% | 1.74% | 2.76% | 3.01% | 6.49% | 4.23% | 3.41% | 6.31% |
Drawdowns
SWASX vs. SNXFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWASX drawdown since its inception was -69.47%, which is greater than SNXFX's maximum drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWASX and SNXFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWASX | SNXFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.47% | -55.08% | -14.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.89% | -12.33% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.31% | -25.36% | -6.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.19% | -34.58% | -9.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.76% | -8.94% | -1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.62% | -8.80% | -6.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.54% | +0.04% |
Volatility
SWASX vs. SNXFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) is 4.05%, while Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that SWASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNXFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWASX | SNXFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 4.35% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.68% | 9.32% | -1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.29% | 18.40% | -5.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 17.28% | -1.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 18.69% | -1.65% |