PortfoliosLab logo
SWASX vs. VNQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SWASX and VNQ is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

SWASX vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SWASX:

0.48

VNQ:

0.46

Sortino Ratio

SWASX:

0.67

VNQ:

0.67

Omega Ratio

SWASX:

1.09

VNQ:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

SWASX:

0.26

VNQ:

0.30

Martin Ratio

SWASX:

1.03

VNQ:

1.28

Ulcer Index

SWASX:

6.16%

VNQ:

5.75%

Daily Std Dev

SWASX:

15.17%

VNQ:

18.27%

Max Drawdown

SWASX:

-69.48%

VNQ:

-73.07%

Current Drawdown

SWASX:

-15.33%

VNQ:

-14.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWASX achieves a 2.73% return, which is significantly higher than VNQ's -1.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SWASX has underperformed VNQ with an annualized return of 2.30%, while VNQ has yielded a comparatively higher 4.98% annualized return.


SWASX

YTD

2.73%

1M

2.24%

6M

-1.18%

1Y

7.22%

3Y*

0.10%

5Y*

4.96%

10Y*

2.30%

VNQ

YTD

-1.33%

1M

0.37%

6M

-7.09%

1Y

8.38%

3Y*

0.86%

5Y*

7.43%

10Y*

4.98%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™

Vanguard Real Estate ETF

SWASX vs. VNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWASX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VNQ's 0.12% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SWASX vs. VNQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWASX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SWASX is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SWASX is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SWASX is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SWASX is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SWASX is 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SWASX is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

VNQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VNQ is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VNQ is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VNQ is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VNQ is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VNQ is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VNQ is 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SWASX vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SWASX Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is comparable to the VNQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWASX and VNQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

SWASX vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison

SWASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than VNQ's 4.18% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SWASX
Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™
3.28%3.32%3.32%3.00%3.70%1.11%6.80%4.22%4.16%4.69%3.01%4.81%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
4.18%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%3.60%

Drawdowns

SWASX vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWASX drawdown since its inception was -69.48%, roughly equal to the maximum VNQ drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWASX and VNQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

SWASX vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) is 3.50%, while Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that SWASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...