SWASX vs. BND
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND).
SWASX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on May 30, 2007. BND is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SWASX or BND.
Correlation
The correlation between SWASX and BND is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
SWASX vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SWASX:
0.11
BND:
0.29
SWASX:
0.24
BND:
0.43
SWASX:
1.03
BND:
1.05
SWASX:
0.06
BND:
0.12
SWASX:
0.36
BND:
0.81
SWASX:
4.35%
BND:
1.94%
SWASX:
13.54%
BND:
5.44%
SWASX:
-69.48%
BND:
-18.84%
SWASX:
-18.49%
BND:
-9.43%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWASX achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than BND's 1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, SWASX has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 2.37%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.33% annualized return.
SWASX
0.28%
-5.45%
4.22%
1.23%
-2.13%
2.37%
BND
1.30%
-0.40%
1.12%
1.56%
-0.41%
1.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWASX vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWASX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SWASX vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SWASX vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
SWASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than BND's 3.67% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWASX Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ | 2.68% | 3.32% | 3.00% | 3.70% | 1.11% | 6.80% | 4.22% | 4.16% | 4.69% | 3.01% | 4.81% | 4.01% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 1.97% | 2.22% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% | 2.79% | 2.78% |
Drawdowns
SWASX vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWASX drawdown since its inception was -69.48%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWASX and BND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SWASX vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.69%. This indicates that SWASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.