PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNXFX vs. SWPPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNXFX vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SNXFX having a 10.52% return and SWPPX slightly lower at 10.15%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SNXFX having a 15.23% annualized return and SWPPX not far ahead at 15.55%.


SNXFX

1D
1.13%
1M
0.82%
YTD
10.52%
6M
9.76%
1Y
27.01%
3Y*
20.85%
5Y*
13.28%
10Y*
15.23%

SWPPX

1D
1.10%
1M
0.47%
YTD
10.15%
6M
9.65%
1Y
27.14%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
14.08%
10Y*
15.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNXFX vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SNXFX
Schwab 1000 Index Fund
10.52%17.23%24.46%26.53%-19.46%26.10%20.71%31.43%-5.04%21.71%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
10.15%17.87%24.96%26.26%-18.14%28.67%18.38%31.46%-4.47%21.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SNXFX and SWPPX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 1997

1.00

The correlation between SNXFX and SWPPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

SNXFX vs. SWPPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SNXFX
SWPPX

Technology

38.1%
39.0%

Financial Services

11.2%
11.1%

Communication Services

10.1%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
9.9%

Industrials

8.9%
7.8%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
4.5%

Energy

3.2%
3.1%

Utilities

2.1%
2.1%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.7%

Technology

SNXFX
38.1%
SWPPX
39.0%

Financial Services

SNXFX
11.2%
SWPPX
11.1%

Communication Services

SNXFX
10.1%
SWPPX
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SNXFX
9.8%
SWPPX
9.9%

Industrials

SNXFX
8.9%
SWPPX
7.8%

Healthcare

SNXFX
8.4%
SWPPX
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

SNXFX
4.3%
SWPPX
4.5%

Energy

SNXFX
3.2%
SWPPX
3.1%

Utilities

SNXFX
2.1%
SWPPX
2.1%

Real Estate

SNXFX
2.0%
SWPPX
1.8%

Basic Materials

SNXFX
1.9%
SWPPX
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNXFX vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNXFX
SNXFX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SNXFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNXFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNXFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SNXFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNXFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SWPPX
SWPPX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SWPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SWPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNXFX vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNXFXSWPPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.39

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

3.04

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.44

13.71

-0.27

SNXFX vs. SWPPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNXFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the SWPPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNXFX and SWPPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNXFX vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNXFX drawdown since its inception was -55.08%, roughly equal to the maximum SWPPX drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNXFX and SWPPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNXFXSWPPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.08%

-55.06%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-8.89%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.21%

-18.74%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-24.51%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.58%

-33.80%

-0.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-1.38%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.75%

-9.93%

+1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.97%

+0.02%

Volatility

SNXFX vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) have volatilities of 4.92% and 4.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNXFXSWPPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

4.83%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.09%

9.94%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.76%

12.50%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.41%

17.03%

+0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

18.27%

+0.51%

SNXFX vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNXFX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SNXFX vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison

SNXFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than SWPPX's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SNXFX
Schwab 1000 Index Fund
1.32%1.45%1.23%1.41%1.61%1.74%2.76%3.01%6.49%4.23%3.41%6.31%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
1.01%1.11%1.23%1.43%1.67%1.27%1.81%1.95%2.67%1.79%2.55%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, SNXFX and SWPPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SNXFX has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to SWPPX (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNXFX dropped -55.08% vs SWPPX's -55.06%.

SWPPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNXFX and SWPPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer