PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWASX vs. SWRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWASX vs. SWRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund (SWRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWASX achieves a 6.78% return, which is significantly higher than SWRSX's 1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SWASX has outperformed SWRSX with an annualized return of 3.61%, while SWRSX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.61% annualized return.


SWASX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
6.78%
6M
7.10%
1Y
12.37%
3Y*
8.36%
5Y*
1.29%
10Y*
3.61%

SWRSX

1D
0.29%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.23%
6M
1.33%
1Y
3.97%
3Y*
3.85%
5Y*
1.08%
10Y*
2.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWASX vs. SWRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWASX
Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™
6.78%11.33%1.42%8.49%-25.10%25.32%-12.10%27.81%-7.66%14.38%
SWRSX
Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund
1.23%6.84%1.95%3.80%-12.01%5.83%10.88%8.38%-1.32%2.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SWASX and SWRSX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007

0.01

Over the past year, SWASX and SWRSX have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWASX vs. SWRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWASX
SWASX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SWASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWASX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
SWASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWASX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

SWRSX
SWRSX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
SWRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SWRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWASX vs. SWRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund (SWRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWASXSWRSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.24

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

2.20

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.16

6.58

-2.42

SWASX vs. SWRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the SWRSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWASX and SWRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWASX vs. SWRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWASX drawdown since its inception was -69.47%, which is greater than SWRSX's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWASX and SWRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWASXSWRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.47%

-14.29%

-55.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.89%

-1.90%

-8.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.23%

-4.46%

-12.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.31%

-14.29%

-18.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.19%

-14.29%

-29.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.14%

-0.57%

-3.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.48%

-3.72%

-11.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

0.64%

+2.26%

Volatility

SWASX vs. SWRSX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund (SWRSX) at 1.05%. This indicates that SWASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWASXSWRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

1.05%

+3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.92%

2.30%

+6.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.55%

3.19%

+8.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.47%

6.02%

+9.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.10%

5.37%

+11.73%

SWASX vs. SWRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWASX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SWRSX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWASX vs. SWRSX - Dividend Comparison

SWASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than SWRSX's 3.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWASX
Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™
3.26%3.11%3.32%3.29%3.00%3.71%2.94%7.38%4.24%3.32%4.67%3.00%
SWRSX
Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund
3.80%4.20%3.68%3.11%7.95%4.45%1.33%2.20%2.87%1.75%1.81%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWASX and SWRSX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWASX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to SWRSX (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWASX dropped -69.47% vs SWRSX's -14.29%.

SWRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWASX and SWRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer