SWASX vs. SWISX
SWASX (Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™) and SWISX (Schwab International Index Fund) are both mutual funds - SWASX is a REIT fund managed by Charles Schwab, while SWISX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index (Net). Over the past 10 years, SWASX returned 3.61%/yr vs 9.58%/yr for SWISX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SWASX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SWISX.
Performance
SWASX vs. SWISX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWASX achieves a 6.78% return, which is significantly lower than SWISX's 10.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SWASX has underperformed SWISX with an annualized return of 3.61%, while SWISX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.58% annualized return.
SWASX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- 6.78%
- 6M
- 7.10%
- 1Y
- 12.37%
- 3Y*
- 8.36%
- 5Y*
- 1.29%
- 10Y*
- 3.61%
SWISX
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 10.58%
- 6M
- 10.97%
- 1Y
- 25.29%
- 3Y*
- 16.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
SWASX vs. SWISX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWASX Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ | 6.78% | 11.33% | 1.42% | 8.49% | -25.10% | 25.32% | -12.10% | 27.81% | -7.66% | 14.38% |
SWISX Schwab International Index Fund | 10.58% | 31.59% | 3.54% | 18.13% | -14.30% | 11.25% | 8.14% | 21.87% | -13.38% | 25.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWASX and SWISX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007 | 0.75 |
The correlation between SWASX and SWISX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWASX vs. SWISX — Risk / Return Rank
SWASX
SWISX
SWASX vs. SWISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Schwab International Index Fund (SWISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWASX | SWISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.28 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 2.14 | -1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.16 | 8.03 | -3.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWASX vs. SWISX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWASX drawdown since its inception was -69.47%, which is greater than SWISX's maximum drawdown of -60.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWASX and SWISX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWASX | SWISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.47% | -60.65% | -8.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.89% | -11.39% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.23% | -13.68% | -3.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.31% | -29.42% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.19% | -33.83% | -10.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.14% | 0.00% | -4.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.48% | -14.79% | -0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 3.04% | -0.14% |
Volatility
SWASX vs. SWISX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) is 4.15%, while Schwab International Index Fund (SWISX) has a volatility of 5.02%. This indicates that SWASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWASX | SWISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 5.02% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.92% | 13.02% | -4.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.55% | 15.62% | -4.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 16.37% | -0.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 16.88% | +0.22% |
SWASX vs. SWISX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWASX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SWISX's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
SWASX vs. SWISX - Dividend Comparison
SWASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than SWISX's 3.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWASX Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ | 3.26% | 3.11% | 3.32% | 3.29% | 3.00% | 3.71% | 2.94% | 7.38% | 4.24% | 3.32% | 4.67% | 3.00% |
SWISX Schwab International Index Fund | 3.21% | 3.55% | 3.29% | 3.31% | 2.73% | 3.34% | 1.88% | 3.09% | 3.15% | 2.71% | 3.19% | 2.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SWASX and SWISX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWISX has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to SWASX (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWASX dropped -69.47% vs SWISX's -60.65%.
SWISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWASX and SWISX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer