SNXFX vs. SWAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX).
SNXFX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Schwab 1000 Index. It was launched on Apr 2, 1991. SWAGX is managed by Charles Schwab.
Performance
SNXFX vs. SWAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SNXFX vs. SWAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNXFX Schwab 1000 Index Fund | -4.19% | 17.23% | 24.46% | 26.53% | -19.46% | 26.10% | 20.71% | 31.43% | -5.04% | 14.91% |
SWAGX Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund | -0.33% | 7.11% | 1.38% | 5.46% | -13.62% | -2.29% | 7.39% | 8.64% | -0.11% | 2.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNXFX achieves a -4.19% return, which is significantly lower than SWAGX's -0.33% return.
SNXFX
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -5.11%
- YTD
- -4.19%
- 6M
- -2.28%
- 1Y
- 17.24%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.92%
- 10Y*
- 13.72%
SWAGX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- -0.33%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 3.70%
- 3Y*
- 3.43%
- 5Y*
- -0.05%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SNXFX vs. SWAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNXFX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SWAGX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SNXFX vs. SWAGX — Risk / Return Rank
SNXFX
SWAGX
SNXFX vs. SWAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNXFX | SWAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 0.89 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 1.28 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.16 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 1.58 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.11 | 4.44 | +2.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNXFX | SWAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 0.89 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | -0.01 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.31 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between SNXFX and SWAGX is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SNXFX vs. SWAGX - Dividend Comparison
SNXFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than SWAGX's 3.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNXFX Schwab 1000 Index Fund | 1.52% | 1.45% | 1.23% | 1.41% | 1.61% | 1.74% | 2.76% | 3.01% | 6.49% | 4.23% | 3.41% | 6.31% |
SWAGX Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund | 3.76% | 4.02% | 3.88% | 3.22% | 1.93% | 1.56% | 2.47% | 2.87% | 2.80% | 1.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SNXFX vs. SWAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNXFX drawdown since its inception was -55.08%, which is greater than SWAGX's maximum drawdown of -19.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNXFX and SWAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNXFX | SWAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.08% | -19.68% | -35.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.33% | -2.84% | -9.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.36% | -18.76% | -6.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.25% | -4.07% | -2.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.80% | -5.72% | -3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 1.01% | +1.56% |
Volatility
SNXFX vs. SWAGX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX) at 1.63%. This indicates that SNXFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SNXFX | SWAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 1.63% | +3.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.77% | 2.69% | +7.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.59% | 4.48% | +14.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 6.06% | +11.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.72% | 5.13% | +13.59% |