PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWASX vs. SCHF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWASX vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWASX achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 15.56% return. Over the past 10 years, SWASX has underperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 3.62%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively higher 10.27% annualized return.


SWASX

1D
0.14%
1M
-1.52%
YTD
6.48%
6M
6.65%
1Y
12.40%
3Y*
8.97%
5Y*
1.03%
10Y*
3.62%

SCHF

1D
-0.86%
1M
5.91%
YTD
15.56%
6M
18.62%
1Y
32.67%
3Y*
19.90%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
10.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWASX vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWASX
Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™
6.48%11.33%1.42%8.49%-25.10%25.32%-12.10%27.81%-7.66%14.38%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
15.56%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%9.48%22.26%-14.29%26.03%

Correlation

The correlation between SWASX and SCHF is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009

0.75

The correlation between SWASX and SCHF shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWASX vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWASX
SWASX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
SWASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWASX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
SWASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWASX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWASX vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWASXSCHFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.37

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

2.86

-1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.32

11.11

-6.79

SWASX vs. SCHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the SCHF Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWASX and SCHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWASXSCHFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

2.09

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.60

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.60

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.44

-0.32

Drawdowns

SWASX vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWASX drawdown since its inception was -69.47%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWASX and SCHF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWASXSCHFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.47%

-34.87%

-34.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.89%

-11.48%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.23%

-13.41%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.31%

-29.14%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.19%

-34.87%

-9.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.40%

-0.86%

-3.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.51%

-7.38%

-8.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.95%

-0.15%

Volatility

SWASX vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) is 3.34%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that SWASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWASXSCHFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

5.66%

-2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.44%

13.34%

-4.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.15%

15.74%

-4.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.45%

16.39%

-0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.08%

17.18%

-0.10%

SWASX vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWASX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWASX vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison

SWASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than SCHF's 2.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
2.96%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%
SWASX
Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™
3.26%3.11%3.32%3.29%3.00%3.71%2.94%7.38%4.24%3.32%4.67%3.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWASX and SCHF have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHF has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to SWASX (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWASX dropped -69.47% vs SCHF's -34.87%.

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWASX and SCHF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer