SWASX vs. SCHF

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SWASX (Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both funds - SWASX is a REIT fund managed by Charles Schwab, while SCHF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Over the past 10 years, SWASX returned 3.56%/yr vs 10.18%/yr for SCHF. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SWASX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHF.

Performance

SWASX vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWASX achieves a 12.73% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 14.79% return. Over the past 10 years, SWASX has underperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 3.56%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively higher 10.18% annualized return.

SWASX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 2.62%
• 6M: 8.40%
• YTD: 12.73%
• 1Y: 18.75%
• 3Y*: 9.42%
• 5Y*: 1.89%
• 10Y*: 3.56%
• ALL TIME*: 2.69%

SCHF

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -0.15%
• 6M: 8.48%
• YTD: 14.79%
• 1Y: 30.87%
• 3Y*: 18.32%
• 5Y*: 10.08%
• 10Y*: 10.18%
• ALL TIME*: 7.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	$215.25M	$219.24M	$213.98M
SWASX Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SWASX vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SWASX Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™	12.73%	11.33%	1.42%	8.49%	-25.10%	25.32%	-12.10%	27.81%	-7.66%	14.38%
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	14.79%	34.55%	3.28%	18.35%	-14.80%	11.40%	9.48%	22.26%	-14.29%	26.03%

Correlation

The correlation between SWASX and SCHF is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009	0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between SWASX and SCHF has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

SWASX vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SWASX

SWASX Risk / Return Rank: 55
SWASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
SWASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
SWASX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
SWASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
SWASX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

SCHF

SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 77
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SWASX vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SWASX	SCHF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	1.75	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	2.42	-0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.32	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.61	2.65	-1.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.03	9.84	-3.82

SWASX vs. SCHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the SCHF Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWASX and SCHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SWASX vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWASX drawdown since its inception was -69.47%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWASX and SCHF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWASX	SCHF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.47%	-34.87%	-34.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.89%	-11.48%	+0.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.23%	-13.41%	-3.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.31%	-29.14%	-3.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.19%	-34.87%	-9.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-2.45%	+2.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.39%	-7.33%	-8.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	3.08%	-0.17%

Volatility

SWASX vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) is 2.88%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that SWASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWASX	SCHF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.88%	5.38%	-2.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.31%	15.48%	-6.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.51%	17.39%	-5.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.46%	16.70%	-1.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.05%	17.05%	0.00%

SWASX vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWASX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

SWASX vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison

SWASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, more than SCHF's 3.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	3.07%	3.42%	3.26%	2.97%	2.80%	3.19%	2.08%	2.95%	3.06%	2.35%	2.58%	2.26%
SWASX Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™	3.28%	3.11%	3.32%	3.29%	3.00%	3.71%	2.94%	7.38%	4.24%	3.32%	4.67%	3.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWASX and SCHF in my portfolio?

SWASX and SCHF have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SWASX or SCHF?

SCHF has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to SWASX (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWASX dropped -69.47% vs SCHF's -34.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.