SWASX vs. SCHF
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF).
SWASX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on May 30, 2007. SCHF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009.
Performance
SWASX vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWASX vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWASX Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ | -0.59% | 11.33% | 1.42% | 8.49% | -25.10% | 25.32% | -12.10% | 27.81% | -7.66% | 14.38% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.95% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWASX achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 2.95% return. Over the past 10 years, SWASX has underperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 3.10%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively higher 9.42% annualized return.
SWASX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -10.76%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- 9.61%
- 3Y*
- 6.09%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- 3.10%
SCHF
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- -8.44%
- YTD
- 2.95%
- 6M
- 9.36%
- 1Y
- 29.56%
- 3Y*
- 16.15%
- 5Y*
- 8.69%
- 10Y*
- 9.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWASX vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWASX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SWASX vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
SWASX
SCHF
SWASX vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWASX | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 1.68 | -0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.07 | 2.30 | -1.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.34 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 2.47 | -1.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.80 | 9.63 | -5.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWASX | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 1.68 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.54 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.55 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.40 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWASX and SCHF is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWASX vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
SWASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than SCHF's 3.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWASX Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ | 2.23% | 3.11% | 3.32% | 3.29% | 3.00% | 3.71% | 2.94% | 7.38% | 4.24% | 3.32% | 4.67% | 3.00% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 3.32% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Drawdowns
SWASX vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWASX drawdown since its inception was -69.47%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWASX and SCHF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWASX | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.47% | -34.87% | -34.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.89% | -11.48% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.31% | -29.14% | -3.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.19% | -34.87% | -9.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.76% | -8.60% | -2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.62% | -7.44% | -8.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.95% | -0.37% |
Volatility
SWASX vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) is 4.05%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 8.47%. This indicates that SWASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWASX | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 8.47% | -4.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.68% | 11.70% | -4.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.29% | 17.72% | -4.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 16.14% | -0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 17.09% | -0.05% |