SVR-C.TO vs. SI=F
SVR-C.TO (iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while SI=F (Silver) is an asset. Over the past 10 years, SVR-C.TO returned 16.34%/yr vs 17.08%/yr for SI=F. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
SVR-C.TO vs. SI=F - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SVR-C.TO is traded in CAD, while SI=F is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SI=F values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVR-C.TO achieves a 4.34% return, which is significantly lower than SI=F's 5.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SVR-C.TO having a 16.34% annualized return and SI=F not far ahead at 17.08%.
SVR-C.TO
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- 4.34%
- 6M
- 27.93%
- 1Y
- 114.32%
- 3Y*
- 47.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.42%
- 10Y*
- 16.34%
SI=F
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 5.71%
- 6M
- 27.62%
- 1Y
- 116.09%
- 3Y*
- 47.34%
- 5Y*
- 24.90%
- 10Y*
- 17.08%
SVR-C.TO vs. SI=F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVR-C.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) | 4.34% | 132.91% | 30.61% | -2.65% | 9.31% | -12.72% | 43.88% | 9.28% | -2.35% | -2.30% |
SI=F Silver | 5.71% | 130.37% | 31.84% | -2.02% | 10.28% | -12.38% | 44.89% | 9.65% | -1.67% | 0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVR-C.TO and SI=F is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2011 | 0.63 |
The correlation between SVR-C.TO and SI=F has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVR-C.TO vs. SI=F — Risk / Return Rank
SVR-C.TO
SI=F
SVR-C.TO vs. SI=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) and Silver (SI=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SVR-C.TO | SI=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.33 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 2.21 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.90 | 4.69 | +1.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SVR-C.TO | SI=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 1.52 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.63 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.50 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.34 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
SVR-C.TO vs. SI=F - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVR-C.TO drawdown since its inception was -61.14%, roughly equal to the maximum SI=F drawdown of -62.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVR-C.TO and SI=F.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVR-C.TO | SI=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.14% | -62.82% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.54% | -40.56% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.54% | -40.56% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.54% | -40.56% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.54% | -40.72% | -0.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.45% | -35.12% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.58% | -34.42% | -1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.43% | 20.92% | -1.49% |
Volatility
SVR-C.TO vs. SI=F - Volatility Comparison
iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.02% compared to Silver (SI=F) at 14.47%. This indicates that SVR-C.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SI=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVR-C.TO | SI=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.02% | 14.47% | +1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.45% | 59.37% | -3.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.72% | 59.22% | -2.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.56% | 36.67% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.57% | 32.45% | +1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SVR-C.TO and SI=F have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SVR-C.TO and SI=F
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer