PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SVR-C.TO vs. SI=F
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SVR-C.TO vs. SI=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) and Silver (SI=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SVR-C.TO is traded in CAD, while SI=F is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SI=F values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVR-C.TO achieves a 4.34% return, which is significantly lower than SI=F's 5.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SVR-C.TO having a 16.34% annualized return and SI=F not far ahead at 17.08%.


SVR-C.TO

1D
0.73%
1M
3.50%
YTD
4.34%
6M
27.93%
1Y
114.32%
3Y*
47.04%
5Y*
24.42%
10Y*
16.34%

SI=F

1D
-2.06%
1M
2.19%
YTD
5.71%
6M
27.62%
1Y
116.09%
3Y*
47.34%
5Y*
24.90%
10Y*
17.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SVR-C.TO vs. SI=F - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SVR-C.TO
iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)
4.34%132.91%30.61%-2.65%9.31%-12.72%43.88%9.28%-2.35%-2.30%
SI=F
Silver
5.71%130.37%31.84%-2.02%10.28%-12.38%44.89%9.65%-1.67%0.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SVR-C.TO and SI=F is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2011

0.63

The correlation between SVR-C.TO and SI=F has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SVR-C.TO vs. SI=F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVR-C.TO
SVR-C.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SVR-C.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

SI=F
SI=F Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SI=F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SI=F Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SI=F Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SI=F Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SI=F Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVR-C.TO vs. SI=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) and Silver (SI=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SVR-C.TOSI=FDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.33

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

2.21

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.90

4.69

+1.21

SVR-C.TO vs. SI=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVR-C.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the SI=F Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVR-C.TO and SI=F, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SVR-C.TOSI=FDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

1.52

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.63

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.50

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.34

-0.11

Drawdowns

SVR-C.TO vs. SI=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVR-C.TO drawdown since its inception was -61.14%, roughly equal to the maximum SI=F drawdown of -62.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVR-C.TO and SI=F.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SVR-C.TOSI=FDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.14%

-62.82%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.54%

-40.56%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.54%

-40.56%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.54%

-40.56%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.54%

-40.72%

-0.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.45%

-35.12%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.58%

-34.42%

-1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.43%

20.92%

-1.49%

Volatility

SVR-C.TO vs. SI=F - Volatility Comparison

iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.02% compared to Silver (SI=F) at 14.47%. This indicates that SVR-C.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SI=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SVR-C.TOSI=FDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.02%

14.47%

+1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.45%

59.37%

-3.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.72%

59.22%

-2.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.56%

36.67%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.57%

32.45%

+1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


SVR-C.TO and SI=F have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SVR-C.TO and SI=F

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer