PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SI=F vs. GLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SI=F and GLD is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

SI=F vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Silver (SI=F) and SPDR Gold Trust (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.92%
9.53%
SI=F
GLD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SI=F:

1.30

GLD:

2.07

Sortino Ratio

SI=F:

1.81

GLD:

2.71

Omega Ratio

SI=F:

1.25

GLD:

1.36

Calmar Ratio

SI=F:

0.74

GLD:

3.84

Martin Ratio

SI=F:

4.91

GLD:

10.43

Ulcer Index

SI=F:

8.22%

GLD:

2.99%

Daily Std Dev

SI=F:

30.13%

GLD:

15.10%

Max Drawdown

SI=F:

-91.54%

GLD:

-45.56%

Current Drawdown

SI=F:

-34.94%

GLD:

-3.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SI=F achieves a 9.26% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 2.79% return. Over the past 10 years, SI=F has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 4.82%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.36% annualized return.


SI=F

YTD

9.26%

1M

3.01%

6M

4.92%

1Y

36.92%

5Y*

9.76%

10Y*

4.82%

GLD

YTD

2.79%

1M

1.63%

6M

9.53%

1Y

32.45%

5Y*

11.22%

10Y*

7.36%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SI=F vs. GLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SI=F
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SI=F is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SI=F is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SI=F is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SI=F is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SI=F is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SI=F is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLD is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLD is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLD is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLD is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLD is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLD is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SI=F vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silver (SI=F) and SPDR Gold Trust (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.001.302.20
The chart of Sortino ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 1.81, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.501.812.87
The chart of Omega ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market1.101.201.301.401.251.40
The chart of Calmar ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 0.74, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.000.744.02
The chart of Martin ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 4.91, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.004.9110.46
SI=F
GLD

The current SI=F Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SI=F and GLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.30
2.20
SI=F
GLD

Drawdowns

SI=F vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SI=F drawdown since its inception was -91.54%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SI=F and GLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-34.94%
-3.35%
SI=F
GLD

Volatility

SI=F vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

Silver (SI=F) has a higher volatility of 8.37% compared to SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) at 2.87%. This indicates that SI=F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
8.37%
2.87%
SI=F
GLD
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab