PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SI=F vs. GLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


SI=FGLD
YTD Return22.56%12.46%
1Y Return28.76%21.27%
3Y Return (Ann)3.24%8.90%
5Y Return (Ann)11.25%10.07%
10Y Return (Ann)2.77%5.33%
Sharpe Ratio1.051.58
Daily Std Dev26.62%13.32%
Max Drawdown-91.54%-45.56%
Current Drawdown-39.41%-4.26%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between SI=F and GLD is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

SI=F vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SI=F achieves a 22.56% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 12.46% return. Over the past 10 years, SI=F has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 2.77%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 5.33% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%2024FebruaryMarchAprilMayJune
22.56%
12.46%
SI=F
GLD

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Silver

SPDR Gold Trust

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SI=F vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silver (SI=F) and SPDR Gold Trust (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SI=F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.001.502.001.05
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.001.60
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.22
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 0.51, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.500.51
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 3.41, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.003.41
GLD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLD, currently valued at 1.76, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.001.502.001.76
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLD, currently valued at 2.49, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.002.49
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GLD, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLD, currently valued at 1.75, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.501.75
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GLD, currently valued at 9.01, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.009.01

SI=F vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SI=F Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of SI=F and GLD.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002024FebruaryMarchAprilMayJune
1.05
1.76
SI=F
GLD

Drawdowns

SI=F vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SI=F drawdown since its inception was -91.54%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SI=F and GLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%2024FebruaryMarchAprilMayJune
-39.41%
-4.26%
SI=F
GLD

Volatility

SI=F vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

Silver (SI=F) has a higher volatility of 12.72% compared to SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) at 5.24%. This indicates that SI=F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%2024FebruaryMarchAprilMayJune
12.72%
5.24%
SI=F
GLD