SI=F vs. RGLD

In the year-to-date period, SI=F achieves a 14.19% return, which is significantly lower than RGLD's 36.34% return. Over the past 10 years, SI=F has underperformed RGLD with an annualized return of 7.17%, while RGLD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.09% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silver (SI=F) and Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current SI=F Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the RGLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SI=F and RGLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

The maximum SI=F drawdown since its inception was -91.54%, smaller than the maximum RGLD drawdown of -98.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SI=F and RGLD.

The current volatility for Silver (SI=F) is 5.68%, while Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) has a volatility of 11.42%. This indicates that SI=F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.