PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SI=F vs. RGLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


SI=FRGLD
YTD Return31.19%18.38%
1Y Return38.60%34.61%
3Y Return (Ann)9.87%14.50%
5Y Return (Ann)10.10%3.67%
10Y Return (Ann)5.15%9.53%
Sharpe Ratio1.201.32
Daily Std Dev29.09%26.99%
Max Drawdown-91.54%-99.57%
Current Drawdown-35.14%-3.21%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between SI=F and RGLD is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

SI=F vs. RGLD - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SI=F achieves a 31.19% return, which is significantly higher than RGLD's 18.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SI=F has underperformed RGLD with an annualized return of 5.15%, while RGLD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.53% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
27.11%
17.15%
SI=F
RGLD

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SI=F vs. RGLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silver (SI=F) and Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SI=F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.001.20
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 1.74, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.001.74
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 0.65, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.000.65
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 4.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.13
RGLD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RGLD, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.001.20
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RGLD, currently valued at 1.77, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.001.77
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RGLD, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.23
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RGLD, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.001.06
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RGLD, currently valued at 5.20, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.005.20

SI=F vs. RGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SI=F Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which roughly equals the RGLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of SI=F and RGLD.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
1.20
1.20
SI=F
RGLD

Drawdowns

SI=F vs. RGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SI=F drawdown since its inception was -91.54%, smaller than the maximum RGLD drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SI=F and RGLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-35.14%
-3.21%
SI=F
RGLD

Volatility

SI=F vs. RGLD - Volatility Comparison

Silver (SI=F) has a higher volatility of 10.02% compared to Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) at 7.66%. This indicates that SI=F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
10.02%
7.66%
SI=F
RGLD