PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SI=F vs. GC=F
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


SI=FGC=F
YTD Return34.30%30.34%
1Y Return41.99%44.49%
3Y Return (Ann)10.27%13.90%
5Y Return (Ann)10.44%10.84%
10Y Return (Ann)5.09%7.31%
Sharpe Ratio1.312.56
Daily Std Dev29.05%13.93%
Max Drawdown-91.54%-44.36%
Current Drawdown-33.61%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between SI=F and GC=F is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

SI=F vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SI=F achieves a 34.30% return, which is significantly higher than GC=F's 30.34% return. Over the past 10 years, SI=F has underperformed GC=F with an annualized return of 5.09%, while GC=F has yielded a comparatively higher 7.31% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
30.12%
21.23%
SI=F
GC=F

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SI=F vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silver (SI=F) and Gold (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SI=F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.501.52
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 2.11, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.002.11
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.000.82
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 5.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.005.18
GC=F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 2.89, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.502.89
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 3.70, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.003.70
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.55
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 6.75, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.006.75
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 15.89, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.0015.89

SI=F vs. GC=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SI=F Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the GC=F Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of SI=F and GC=F.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
1.52
2.89
SI=F
GC=F

Drawdowns

SI=F vs. GC=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SI=F drawdown since its inception was -91.54%, which is greater than GC=F's maximum drawdown of -44.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SI=F and GC=F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-33.61%
0
SI=F
GC=F

Volatility

SI=F vs. GC=F - Volatility Comparison

Silver (SI=F) has a higher volatility of 9.83% compared to Gold (GC=F) at 3.66%. This indicates that SI=F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GC=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
9.83%
3.66%
SI=F
GC=F