SI=F vs. GC=F
Compare and contrast key facts about Silver (SI=F) and Gold (GC=F).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SI=F or GC=F.
Key characteristics
| SI=F | GC=F | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 24.35% | 24.50% |
| 1Y Return | 29.15% | 30.88% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 4.61% | 9.98% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.83% | 10.49% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 5.12% | 7.09% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.82 | 2.11 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.27 | 2.72 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.17 | 1.39 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.45 | 3.76 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.45 | 11.70 |
| Ulcer Index | 7.06% | 2.55% |
| Daily Std Dev | 30.00% | 14.18% |
| Max Drawdown | -91.54% | -44.36% |
| Current Drawdown | -38.53% | -7.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between SI=F and GC=F is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SI=F vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SI=F having a 24.35% return and GC=F slightly higher at 24.50%. Over the past 10 years, SI=F has underperformed GC=F with an annualized return of 5.12%, while GC=F has yielded a comparatively higher 7.09% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SI=F vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silver (SI=F) and Gold (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Drawdowns
SI=F vs. GC=F - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SI=F drawdown since its inception was -91.54%, which is greater than GC=F's maximum drawdown of -44.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SI=F and GC=F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SI=F vs. GC=F - Volatility Comparison
Silver (SI=F) has a higher volatility of 10.29% compared to Gold (GC=F) at 5.11%. This indicates that SI=F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GC=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.