SVR-C.TO vs. PSLV.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR-C.TO) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV.TO).

SVR-C.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Silver. It was launched on Mar 4, 2011.

Performance

SVR-C.TO vs. PSLV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR-C.TO) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SVR-C.TO vs. PSLV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SVR-C.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF	6.86%	132.91%	30.61%	-2.65%	9.31%	-12.72%	43.88%	9.28%	-0.12%
PSLV.TO Sprott Physical Silver Trust	4.37%	134.39%	29.63%	-4.04%	9.85%	-14.35%	39.25%	11.53%	1.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVR-C.TO achieves a 6.86% return, which is significantly higher than PSLV.TO's 4.37% return.

SVR-C.TO

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -15.21%
• YTD: 6.86%
• 6M: 57.03%
• 1Y: 112.40%
• 3Y*: 46.78%
• 5Y*: 26.69%
• 10Y*: 17.48%

PSLV.TO

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -16.80%
• YTD: 4.37%
• 6M: 52.56%
• 1Y: 105.39%
• 3Y*: 44.48%
• 5Y*: 24.68%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SVR-C.TO vs. PSLV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVR-C.TO

SVR-C.TO Risk / Return Rank: 83
SVR-C.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
SVR-C.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
SVR-C.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 89
SVR-C.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
SVR-C.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 73

PSLV.TO

PSLV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 85
PSLV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PSLV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
PSLV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 87
PSLV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
PSLV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVR-C.TO vs. PSLV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR-C.TO) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SVR-C.TO	PSLV.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	1.94	+0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	2.09	+0.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.36	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	2.60	+0.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.03	8.05	-0.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SVR-C.TO vs. PSLV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVR-C.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the PSLV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVR-C.TO and PSLV.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SVR-C.TO	PSLV.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05	1.94	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	0.76	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.55	-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between SVR-C.TO and PSLV.TO is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SVR-C.TO vs. PSLV.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither SVR-C.TO nor PSLV.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SVR-C.TO vs. PSLV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVR-C.TO drawdown since its inception was -61.14%, which is greater than PSLV.TO's maximum drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVR-C.TO and PSLV.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SVR-C.TO	PSLV.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.14%	-41.53%	-19.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.54%	-39.47%	-2.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.54%	-39.47%	-2.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.89%	-31.25%	-2.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.60%	-15.36%	-20.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.72%	12.77%	+0.95%

Volatility

SVR-C.TO vs. PSLV.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR-C.TO) is 16.65%, while Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV.TO) has a volatility of 17.94%. This indicates that SVR-C.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSLV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SVR-C.TO	PSLV.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.65%	17.94%	-1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.73%	54.40%	+0.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.09%	54.75%	+0.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.76%	32.56%	+3.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.05%	37.03%	-3.98%