SI=F vs. MAG

In the year-to-date period, SI=F achieves a 14.19% return, which is significantly lower than MAG's 40.50% return. Over the past 10 years, SI=F has underperformed MAG with an annualized return of 7.17%, while MAG has yielded a comparatively higher 9.83% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silver (SI=F) and MAG Silver Corp. (MAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current SI=F Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the MAG Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SI=F and MAG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

The maximum SI=F drawdown since its inception was -91.54%, which is greater than MAG's maximum drawdown of -81.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SI=F and MAG.

The current volatility for Silver (SI=F) is 5.68%, while MAG Silver Corp. (MAG) has a volatility of 12.50%. This indicates that SI=F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.