PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SI=F vs. MAG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


SI=FMAG
YTD Return31.19%40.15%
1Y Return38.60%40.42%
3Y Return (Ann)9.87%-4.36%
5Y Return (Ann)10.10%5.65%
10Y Return (Ann)5.15%6.98%
Sharpe Ratio1.200.99
Daily Std Dev29.09%45.34%
Max Drawdown-91.54%-81.82%
Current Drawdown-35.14%-38.44%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between SI=F and MAG is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

SI=F vs. MAG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SI=F achieves a 31.19% return, which is significantly lower than MAG's 40.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SI=F has underperformed MAG with an annualized return of 5.15%, while MAG has yielded a comparatively higher 6.98% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
27.11%
37.90%
SI=F
MAG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SI=F vs. MAG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silver (SI=F) and MAG Silver Corp. (MAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SI=F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.001.20
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 1.74, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.001.74
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 0.65, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.000.65
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SI=F, currently valued at 4.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.13
MAG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MAG, currently valued at 0.85, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.000.85
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MAG, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.001.47
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MAG, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.18
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MAG, currently valued at 0.57, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.000.57
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MAG, currently valued at 2.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.48

SI=F vs. MAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SI=F Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which roughly equals the MAG Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of SI=F and MAG.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
1.20
0.85
SI=F
MAG

Drawdowns

SI=F vs. MAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SI=F drawdown since its inception was -91.54%, which is greater than MAG's maximum drawdown of -81.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SI=F and MAG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-35.14%
-38.44%
SI=F
MAG

Volatility

SI=F vs. MAG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Silver (SI=F) is 10.02%, while MAG Silver Corp. (MAG) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that SI=F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
10.02%
16.30%
SI=F
MAG