SVR-C.TO vs. CGL.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR-C.TO) and iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CGL.TO).
SVR-C.TO and CGL.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SVR-C.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Silver. It was launched on Mar 4, 2011. CGL.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Gold Bullion. It was launched on May 28, 2009. Both SVR-C.TO and CGL.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SVR-C.TO vs. CGL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SVR-C.TO vs. CGL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVR-C.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF | 6.54% | 132.91% | 30.61% | -2.65% | 9.31% | -12.72% | 43.88% | 9.28% | -2.35% | -2.30% |
CGL.TO iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 8.13% | 60.12% | 25.67% | 11.26% | -1.07% | -4.58% | 23.41% | 16.58% | -3.19% | 11.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVR-C.TO achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly lower than CGL.TO's 8.13% return. Over the past 10 years, SVR-C.TO has outperformed CGL.TO with an annualized return of 17.44%, while CGL.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.77% annualized return.
SVR-C.TO
- 1D
- 7.62%
- 1M
- -18.18%
- YTD
- 6.54%
- 6M
- 59.80%
- 1Y
- 109.49%
- 3Y*
- 46.63%
- 5Y*
- 26.62%
- 10Y*
- 17.44%
CGL.TO
- 1D
- 3.91%
- 1M
- -11.27%
- YTD
- 8.13%
- 6M
- 19.83%
- 1Y
- 45.70%
- 3Y*
- 31.08%
- 5Y*
- 20.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SVR-C.TO vs. CGL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SVR-C.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than CGL.TO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SVR-C.TO vs. CGL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SVR-C.TO
CGL.TO
SVR-C.TO vs. CGL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR-C.TO) and iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CGL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SVR-C.TO | CGL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.00 | 1.65 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.12 | 2.10 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.31 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 2.47 | +0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.09 | 9.06 | -0.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SVR-C.TO | CGL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 1.65 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 1.14 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.79 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.51 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between SVR-C.TO and CGL.TO is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SVR-C.TO vs. CGL.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither SVR-C.TO nor CGL.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SVR-C.TO vs. CGL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVR-C.TO drawdown since its inception was -61.14%, which is greater than CGL.TO's maximum drawdown of -44.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVR-C.TO and CGL.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVR-C.TO | CGL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.14% | -44.53% | -16.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.54% | -19.36% | -22.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.54% | -22.18% | -19.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.54% | -23.72% | -17.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.09% | -13.43% | -20.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.60% | -18.20% | -17.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.62% | 5.29% | +8.33% |
Volatility
SVR-C.TO vs. CGL.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR-C.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.67% compared to iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CGL.TO) at 11.20%. This indicates that SVR-C.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SVR-C.TO | CGL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.67% | 11.20% | +7.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.74% | 24.10% | +30.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.09% | 27.83% | +27.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.76% | 17.98% | +17.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.06% | 16.28% | +16.78% |