STRL vs. UCO
STRL (Sterling Construction Company, Inc.) is a stock, while UCO (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil) is Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). Over the past 10 years, STRL returned 69.42%/yr vs -11.98%/yr for UCO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STRL vs. UCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STRL achieves a 224.51% return, which is significantly higher than UCO's 139.34% return. Over the past 10 years, STRL has outperformed UCO with an annualized return of 69.42%, while UCO has yielded a comparatively lower -11.98% annualized return.
STRL
- 1D
- 3.84%
- 1M
- 23.29%
- YTD
- 224.51%
- 6M
- 199.06%
- 1Y
- 412.74%
- 3Y*
- 171.02%
- 5Y*
- 108.72%
- 10Y*
- 69.42%
UCO
- 1D
- -3.93%
- 1M
- -5.57%
- YTD
- 139.34%
- 6M
- 124.58%
- 1Y
- 115.57%
- 3Y*
- 24.38%
- 5Y*
- 21.18%
- 10Y*
- -11.98%
STRL vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRL Sterling Construction Company, Inc. | 224.51% | 81.79% | 91.57% | 168.08% | 24.71% | 41.32% | 32.17% | 29.29% | -33.11% | 92.43% |
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil | 139.34% | -29.75% | 5.36% | -13.89% | 39.71% | 139.26% | -92.91% | 53.83% | -43.26% | 0.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between STRL and UCO is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2008 | 0.16 |
The correlation between STRL and UCO shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STRL vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank
STRL
UCO
STRL vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STRL | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.31 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 13.42 | 3.34 | +10.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.58 | 6.32 | +31.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STRL | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.16 | 2.03 | +3.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.93 | 0.36 | +1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.31 | -0.17 | +1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | -0.34 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
STRL vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STRL drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, smaller than the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRL and UCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STRL | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.51% | -99.95% | +7.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.02% | -34.77% | +3.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.67% | -50.38% | +2.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.67% | -67.24% | +19.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.60% | -98.75% | +39.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -99.26% | +99.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.32% | -85.49% | +39.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.05% | 18.34% | -7.29% |
Volatility
STRL vs. UCO - Volatility Comparison
Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) has a higher volatility of 24.41% compared to ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) at 20.99%. This indicates that STRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STRL | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.41% | 20.99% | +3.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.59% | 46.57% | +16.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 80.59% | 57.26% | +23.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.75% | 59.81% | -3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.30% | 71.35% | -18.05% |
Dividends
STRL vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison
Neither STRL nor UCO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
STRL and UCO have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STRL has higher volatility (24.41%) compared to UCO (20.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRL dropped -92.51% vs UCO's -99.95%.
STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.16 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STRL and UCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer