PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STRA vs. DRS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

STRA vs. DRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STRA achieves a -2.03% return, which is significantly lower than DRS's 42.93% return.


STRA

1D
-3.06%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
-2.03%
6M
-2.72%
1Y
-5.50%
3Y*
3.48%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
7.26%

DRS

1D
-2.33%
1M
14.43%
YTD
42.93%
6M
41.39%
1Y
8.10%
3Y*
42.32%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STRA vs. DRS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
STRA
Strategic Education, Inc.
-2.03%-11.62%3.53%21.43%-2.05%
DRS
Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock
42.93%6.56%61.23%56.81%10.65%

Correlation

The correlation between STRA and DRS is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2022

0.23

The correlation between STRA and DRS shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

STRA:

$5.64

DRS:

$1.44

PE Ratio

STRA:

13.73

DRS:

33.74

PEG Ratio

STRA:

0.48

DRS:

2.00

PS Ratio

STRA:

1.40

DRS:

2.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

STRA:

$1.27B

DRS:

$3.70B

Gross Profit (TTM)

STRA:

$475.81M

DRS:

$894.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

STRA:

$216.79M

DRS:

$433.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STRA vs. DRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STRA
STRA Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
STRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
STRA Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
STRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
STRA Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

DRS
DRS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRS Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
DRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRS Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STRA vs. DRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STRADRSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.07

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

0.25

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.75

0.51

-1.25

STRA vs. DRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STRA Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the DRS Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STRA and DRS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STRA vs. DRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STRA drawdown since its inception was -85.50%, which is greater than DRS's maximum drawdown of -32.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRA and DRS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STRADRSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.50%

-32.48%

-53.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.75%

-32.48%

+16.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.05%

-32.48%

-5.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.27%

-2.33%

-55.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.04%

-7.25%

-31.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.38%

16.05%

-8.67%

Volatility

STRA vs. DRS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) is 6.97%, while Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) has a volatility of 13.57%. This indicates that STRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STRADRSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.97%

13.57%

-6.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.38%

31.84%

-5.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.96%

40.60%

-8.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.83%

38.73%

-4.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.00%

38.73%

-1.73%

Dividends

STRA vs. DRS - Dividend Comparison

STRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than DRS's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRS
Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock
0.74%1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STRA
Strategic Education, Inc.
3.10%2.99%2.57%2.60%3.06%4.15%2.52%1.32%1.32%1.12%

Financials

STRA vs. DRS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Strategic Education, Inc. and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
305.93M
846.00M
(STRA) Total Revenue
(DRS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

STRA vs. DRS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Strategic Education, Inc. and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%202220232024202520260
25.1%
Portfolio components
STRA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Strategic Education, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 305.93M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

DRS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 212.00M and revenue of 846.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

STRA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Strategic Education, Inc. reported an operating income of 41.09M and revenue of 305.93M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.

DRS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 77.00M and revenue of 846.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

STRA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Strategic Education, Inc. reported a net income of 32.81M and revenue of 305.93M, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.

DRS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 62.00M and revenue of 846.00M, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


STRA and DRS have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRS has higher volatility (13.57%) compared to STRA (6.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRA dropped -85.50% vs DRS's -32.48%.

DRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.20 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STRA and DRS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer