DRS vs. ETN

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN).

Performance

DRS vs. ETN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DRS vs. ETN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DRS Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock	34.78%	6.56%	61.23%	56.81%	16.29%
ETN Eaton Corporation plc	15.13%	-2.79%	39.51%	56.22%	-3.21%

Fundamentals

EPS DRS : $1.55 ETN : $10.47
PE Ratio DRS : 29.56 ETN : 34.93
PEG Ratio DRS : 1.75 ETN : 1.90
PS Ratio DRS : 2.25 ETN : 5.20
Total Revenue (TTM) DRS : $3.65B ETN : $27.45B
Gross Profit (TTM) DRS : $869.00M ETN : $10.32B
EBITDA (TTM) DRS : $208.00M ETN : $5.90B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRS achieves a 34.78% return, which is significantly higher than ETN's 15.13% return.

DRS

• 1D: 3.01%
• 1M: 1.01%
• YTD: 34.78%
• 6M: 3.34%
• 1Y: 40.77%
• 3Y*: 52.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ETN

• 1D: 2.21%
• 1M: -2.84%
• YTD: 15.13%
• 6M: -1.64%
• 1Y: 33.74%
• 3Y*: 30.52%
• 5Y*: 23.26%
• 10Y*: 21.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

DRS vs. ETN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRS

DRS Risk / Return Rank: 68
DRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
DRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
DRS Omega Ratio Rank: 67
DRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
DRS Martin Ratio Rank: 64

ETN

ETN Risk / Return Rank: 71
ETN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
ETN Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
ETN Omega Ratio Rank: 66
ETN Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
ETN Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRS vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DRS	ETN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	0.99	0.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	1.51	+0.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.20	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.25	1.89	-0.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.63	4.21	-1.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DRS vs. ETN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRS Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the ETN Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRS and ETN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DRS	ETN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99	0.99	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.41	0.41	+1.00

Correlation

The correlation between DRS and ETN is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DRS vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison

DRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than ETN's 1.15% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DRS Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock	0.78%	1.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ETN Eaton Corporation plc	1.15%	1.31%	1.13%	1.43%	2.06%	1.76%	1.88%	3.00%	3.85%	3.04%	3.40%	4.23%

Drawdowns

DRS vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRS drawdown since its inception was -32.48%, smaller than the maximum ETN drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRS and ETN.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRS	ETN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.48%	-68.95%	+36.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.48%	-19.14%	-13.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.69%	-7.42%	+2.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.16%	-14.93%	+7.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.49%	8.58%	+6.91%

Volatility

DRS vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison

Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) has a higher volatility of 11.29% compared to Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) at 10.43%. This indicates that DRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DRS	ETN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.29%	10.43%	+0.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.44%	23.39%	+7.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.47%	34.38%	+7.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.54%	29.21%	+9.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.54%	29.65%	+8.89%

Financials

DRS vs. ETN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock and Eaton Corporation plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

DRS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 269.00M and revenue of 1.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.4%.

ETN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a gross profit of 2.60B and revenue of 7.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

DRS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 126.00M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

ETN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported an operating income of 1.38B and revenue of 7.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.

DRS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 102.00M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.

ETN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a net income of 1.13B and revenue of 7.06B, resulting in a net margin of 16.1%.