DRS vs. AVAV
DRS (Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock) and AVAV (AeroVironment, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Aerospace & Defense industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 3 years, DRS returned 41.59%/yr vs 15.09%/yr for AVAV. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
DRS vs. AVAV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRS achieves a 35.63% return, which is significantly higher than AVAV's -38.25% return.
DRS
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- YTD
- 35.63%
- 1Y
- 11.49%
- 3Y*
- 41.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 46.34%
AVAV
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- -21.75%
- 6M
- -46.35%
- YTD
- -38.25%
- 1Y
- -42.57%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.12%
- 10Y*
- 18.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $190.78M | $258.41M | $271.62M | |
| $40.28M | $45.66M | $45.85M |
DRS vs. AVAV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRS Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock | 35.63% | 6.56% | 61.23% | 56.81% | 10.65% |
AVAV AeroVironment, Inc. | -38.25% | 57.18% | 22.10% | 47.14% | -7.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRS and AVAV is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2022 | 0.48 |
The correlation between DRS and AVAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
DRS:
$12.28B
AVAV:
$7.56B
DRS:
$1.60
AVAV:
-$5.41
DRS:
2.46
AVAV:
5.17
DRS:
$3.78B
AVAV:
$1.42B
DRS:
$934.00M
AVAV:
$246.70M
DRS:
$384.00M
AVAV:
-$6.04M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRS vs. AVAV — Risk / Return Rank
DRS
AVAV
DRS vs. AVAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) and AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRS | AVAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.93 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | -0.67 | +1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.91 | -1.08 | +2.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRS vs. AVAV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRS drawdown since its inception was -32.48%, smaller than the maximum AVAV drawdown of -66.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRS and AVAV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRS | AVAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.48% | -66.65% | +34.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.16% | -66.65% | +38.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.48% | -66.65% | +34.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -66.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.33% | -63.55% | +56.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.32% | -28.94% | +21.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.79% | 40.94% | -28.15% |
Volatility
DRS vs. AVAV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) is 10.67%, while AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) has a volatility of 23.79%. This indicates that DRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRS | AVAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.67% | 23.79% | -13.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.61% | 59.10% | -26.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.96% | 74.38% | -34.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.75% | 57.67% | -18.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.75% | 52.98% | -14.23% |
Dividends
DRS vs. AVAV - Dividend Comparison
DRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while AVAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AVAV AeroVironment, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DRS Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock | 0.78% | 1.06% |
Financials
DRS vs. AVAV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock and AeroVironment, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DRS vs. AVAV - Profitability Comparison
DRS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 242.00M and revenue of 913.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.5%.
AVAV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AeroVironment, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 80.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
DRS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 102.00M and revenue of 913.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
AVAV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AeroVironment, Inc. reported an operating income of 56.94M and revenue of 80.12M, resulting in an operating margin of 71.1%.
DRS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 86.00M and revenue of 913.00M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.
AVAV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AeroVironment, Inc. reported a net income of -24.10M and revenue of 80.12M, resulting in a net margin of -30.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DRS and AVAV have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVAV has higher volatility (23.79%) compared to DRS (10.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRS dropped -32.48% vs AVAV's -66.65%.
DRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRS and AVAV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer