DRS vs. CLS
DRS (Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. DRS operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 3 years, DRS returned 41.59%/yr vs 149.34%/yr for CLS. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
DRS vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRS achieves a 35.63% return, which is significantly higher than CLS's 12.12% return.
DRS
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- YTD
- 35.63%
- 1Y
- 11.49%
- 3Y*
- 41.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 46.34%
CLS
- 1D
- -6.00%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- 6M
- 17.95%
- YTD
- 12.12%
- 1Y
- 70.20%
- 3Y*
- 149.34%
- 5Y*
- 106.30%
- 10Y*
- 40.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.16B | $852.74M | $822.47M | |
| $40.28M | $45.66M | $45.85M |
DRS vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRS Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock | 35.63% | 6.56% | 61.23% | 56.81% | 10.65% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 12.12% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 2.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRS and CLS is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2022 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
DRS:
$12.28B
CLS:
$38.11B
DRS:
$1.60
CLS:
$9.64
DRS:
28.83
CLS:
34.38
DRS:
1.71
CLS:
0.46
DRS:
2.46
CLS:
2.46
DRS:
$3.78B
CLS:
$15.62B
DRS:
$934.00M
CLS:
$1.81B
DRS:
$384.00M
CLS:
$1.50B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRS vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
DRS
CLS
DRS vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRS | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.19 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 1.83 | -1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.91 | 4.27 | -3.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRS vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRS drawdown since its inception was -32.48%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRS and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRS | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.48% | -96.93% | +64.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.16% | -36.21% | +8.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.48% | -53.96% | +21.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -53.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.33% | -29.84% | +22.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.32% | -73.10% | +65.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.79% | 15.47% | -2.68% |
Volatility
DRS vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) is 10.67%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 25.97%. This indicates that DRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRS | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.67% | 25.97% | -15.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.61% | 55.62% | -23.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.96% | 74.89% | -34.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.75% | 58.52% | -19.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.75% | 50.65% | -11.90% |
Dividends
DRS vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
DRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CLS Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DRS Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock | 0.78% | 1.06% |
Financials
DRS vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DRS vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
DRS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 242.00M and revenue of 913.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.5%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 577.50M and revenue of 4.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.3%.
DRS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 102.00M and revenue of 913.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 458.30M and revenue of 4.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.
DRS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 86.00M and revenue of 913.00M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 368.80M and revenue of 4.70B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DRS and CLS have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLS has higher volatility (25.97%) compared to DRS (10.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRS dropped -32.48% vs CLS's -96.93%.
CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRS and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer