PortfoliosLab logo
DRS vs. CLS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between DRS and CLS is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

DRS vs. CLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DRS:

1.97

CLS:

1.55

Sortino Ratio

DRS:

2.47

CLS:

2.18

Omega Ratio

DRS:

1.35

CLS:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

DRS:

3.58

CLS:

2.52

Martin Ratio

DRS:

10.28

CLS:

6.28

Ulcer Index

DRS:

7.97%

CLS:

21.66%

Daily Std Dev

DRS:

41.86%

CLS:

75.66%

Max Drawdown

DRS:

-22.90%

CLS:

-96.93%

Current Drawdown

DRS:

-0.79%

CLS:

-21.17%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DRS:

$10.90B

CLS:

$13.09B

EPS

DRS:

$0.88

CLS:

$3.52

PE Ratio

DRS:

46.56

CLS:

31.67

PS Ratio

DRS:

3.26

CLS:

1.30

PB Ratio

DRS:

4.24

CLS:

8.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

DRS:

$3.35B

CLS:

$10.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DRS:

$758.00M

CLS:

$1.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

DRS:

$394.00M

CLS:

$724.86M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRS achieves a 29.34% return, which is significantly higher than CLS's 22.70% return.


DRS

YTD

29.34%

1M

16.04%

6M

23.93%

1Y

81.78%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CLS

YTD

22.70%

1M

40.58%

6M

37.81%

1Y

116.04%

5Y*

83.79%

10Y*

24.59%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

DRS vs. CLS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DRS is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DRS is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DRS is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DRS is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DRS is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DRS is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

CLS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLS is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLS is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLS is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLS is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLS is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLS is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DRS vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current DRS Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRS and CLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

DRS vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison

DRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

DRS vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRS drawdown since its inception was -22.90%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRS and CLS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

DRS vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) is 12.08%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 17.58%. This indicates that DRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

DRS vs. CLS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
799.00M
2.65B
(DRS) Total Revenue
(CLS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DRS vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock and Celestica Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%20212022202320242025
22.7%
10.3%
(DRS) Gross Margin
(CLS) Gross Margin
DRS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 181.00M and revenue of 799.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.7%.

CLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 273.90M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.3%.

DRS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 59.00M and revenue of 799.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

CLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 128.80M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

DRS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 50.00M and revenue of 799.00M, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.

CLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 86.20M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.