DRS vs. FIP

In the year-to-date period, DRS achieves a 64.57% return, which is significantly lower than FIP's 88.45% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) and FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current DRS Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the FIP Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRS and FIP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

DRS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%.

The maximum DRS drawdown since its inception was -14.64%, smaller than the maximum FIP drawdown of -34.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRS and FIP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) has a higher volatility of 15.16% compared to FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) at 13.24%. This indicates that DRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock and FTAI Infrastructure Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.