STRA vs. GMAB
STRA (Strategic Education, Inc.) and GMAB (Genmab A/S) are both stocks. STRA operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive), while GMAB operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, STRA returned 8.27%/yr vs 4.84%/yr for GMAB. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
STRA vs. GMAB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STRA achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly higher than GMAB's -5.00% return. Over the past 10 years, STRA has outperformed GMAB with an annualized return of 8.27%, while GMAB has yielded a comparatively lower 4.84% annualized return.
STRA
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 5.76%
- 1Y
- 15.04%
- 3Y*
- 6.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.99%
- 10Y*
- 8.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.16%
GMAB
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 4.46%
- 6M
- -8.28%
- YTD
- -5.00%
- 1Y
- 32.40%
- 3Y*
- -7.86%
- 5Y*
- -8.49%
- 10Y*
- 4.84%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
GMAB Genmab A/S | $46.14M | $57.96M | $53.66M |
| $29.00M | $26.02M | $22.75M |
STRA vs. GMAB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRA Strategic Education, Inc. | 5.76% | -11.62% | 3.53% | 21.43% | 40.39% | -37.26% | -38.80% | 42.05% | 28.16% | 12.41% |
GMAB Genmab A/S | -5.00% | 47.58% | -34.45% | -24.87% | 7.13% | -2.71% | 82.09% | 35.54% | -0.61% | -0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between STRA and GMAB is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2009 | 0.10 |
The correlation between STRA and GMAB shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.17 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
STRA:
$1.90B
GMAB:
$17.96B
STRA:
$5.98
GMAB:
$4.06
STRA:
13.97
GMAB:
7.21
STRA:
0.49
GMAB:
0.48
STRA:
1.46
GMAB:
2.13
STRA:
1.11
GMAB:
3.29
STRA:
$1.29B
GMAB:
$8.84B
STRA:
$631.04M
GMAB:
$8.27B
STRA:
$220.20M
GMAB:
$3.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STRA vs. GMAB — Risk / Return Rank
STRA
GMAB
STRA vs. GMAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) and Genmab A/S (GMAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STRA | GMAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.18 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 1.00 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.21 | 1.95 | +0.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STRA vs. GMAB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STRA drawdown since its inception was -85.50%, roughly equal to the maximum GMAB drawdown of -84.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRA and GMAB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STRA | GMAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.50% | -84.20% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.75% | -32.51% | +16.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.05% | -54.12% | +16.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.05% | -63.10% | +25.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.86% | -63.10% | -8.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.96% | -39.94% | -15.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.13% | -31.19% | -7.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.83% | 16.68% | -9.85% |
Volatility
STRA vs. GMAB - Volatility Comparison
Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) has a higher volatility of 15.95% compared to Genmab A/S (GMAB) at 6.04%. This indicates that STRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STRA | GMAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.95% | 6.04% | +9.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.85% | 22.98% | +5.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.09% | 34.16% | +0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.19% | 33.65% | +0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.18% | 34.96% | +2.22% |
Dividends
STRA vs. GMAB - Dividend Comparison
STRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, while GMAB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMAB Genmab A/S | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STRA Strategic Education, Inc. | 2.87% | 2.99% | 2.57% | 2.60% | 3.06% | 4.15% | 2.52% | 1.32% | 1.32% | 1.12% |
Financials
STRA vs. GMAB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Strategic Education, Inc. and Genmab A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STRA vs. GMAB - Profitability Comparison
STRA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Strategic Education, Inc. reported a gross profit of 159.39M and revenue of 337.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.3%.
GMAB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Genmab A/S reported a gross profit of 834.08M and revenue of 899.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.8%.
STRA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Strategic Education, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.48M and revenue of 337.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.0%.
GMAB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Genmab A/S reported an operating income of 225.83M and revenue of 899.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.1%.
STRA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Strategic Education, Inc. reported a net income of 37.16M and revenue of 337.26M, resulting in a net margin of 11.0%.
GMAB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Genmab A/S reported a net income of 53.20M and revenue of 899.32M, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STRA and GMAB have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STRA has higher volatility (15.95%) compared to GMAB (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRA dropped -85.50% vs GMAB's -84.20%.
GMAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STRA and GMAB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer