STNG vs. CF
STNG (Scorpio Tankers Inc.) and CF (CF Industries Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. STNG operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while CF operates in Agricultural Inputs (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, STNG returned 8.38%/yr vs 19.43%/yr for CF. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STNG vs. CF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STNG achieves a 57.90% return, which is significantly higher than CF's 52.60% return. Over the past 10 years, STNG has underperformed CF with an annualized return of 8.38%, while CF has yielded a comparatively higher 19.43% annualized return.
STNG
- 1D
- 4.03%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 46.43%
- YTD
- 57.90%
- 1Y
- 79.55%
- 3Y*
- 24.33%
- 5Y*
- 34.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.38%
CF
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- 9.72%
- 6M
- 42.89%
- YTD
- 52.60%
- 1Y
- 21.57%
- 3Y*
- 19.81%
- 5Y*
- 20.74%
- 10Y*
- 19.43%
STNG vs. CF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STNG Scorpio Tankers Inc. | 57.90% | 6.03% | -16.29% | 15.40% | 325.48% | 17.40% | -70.74% | 127.09% | -41.26% | -31.93% |
CF CF Industries Holdings, Inc. | 52.60% | -7.17% | 10.08% | -4.75% | 22.29% | 87.18% | -15.76% | 12.73% | 5.13% | 40.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between STNG and CF is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2010 | 0.29 |
Over the past year, the correlation between STNG and CF has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
STNG:
$3.95B
CF:
$17.96B
STNG:
$10.16
CF:
$11.18
STNG:
7.80
CF:
10.46
STNG:
0.06
CF:
0.17
STNG:
3.78
CF:
2.48
STNG:
1.16
CF:
2.19
STNG:
$1.04B
CF:
$7.41B
STNG:
$536.91M
CF:
$2.99B
STNG:
$590.06M
CF:
$2.60B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STNG vs. CF — Risk / Return Rank
STNG
CF
STNG vs. CF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) and CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STNG | CF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.13 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 0.98 | +2.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.91 | 1.88 | +7.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STNG vs. CF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STNG drawdown since its inception was -91.13%, which is greater than CF's maximum drawdown of -76.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STNG and CF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STNG | CF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.13% | -76.73% | -14.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.74% | -25.45% | +2.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.97% | -29.16% | -31.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.97% | -48.36% | -12.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.67% | -60.74% | -20.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.12% | -14.68% | +6.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.15% | -24.91% | -24.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.90% | 13.17% | -4.27% |
Volatility
STNG vs. CF - Volatility Comparison
Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) has a higher volatility of 12.53% compared to CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) at 8.65%. This indicates that STNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STNG | CF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.53% | 8.65% | +3.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.31% | 35.68% | -7.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.59% | 41.78% | -3.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.01% | 38.05% | +6.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.21% | 40.12% | +14.09% |
Dividends
STNG vs. CF - Dividend Comparison
STNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than CF's 1.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CF CF Industries Holdings, Inc. | 1.71% | 2.59% | 2.34% | 2.01% | 1.76% | 1.70% | 3.10% | 2.51% | 2.76% | 2.82% | 3.81% | 2.94% |
STNG Scorpio Tankers Inc. | 2.17% | 3.19% | 3.22% | 1.73% | 0.74% | 3.12% | 3.57% | 1.02% | 2.27% | 1.31% | 11.04% | 6.17% |
Financials
STNG vs. CF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Scorpio Tankers Inc. and CF Industries Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STNG vs. CF - Profitability Comparison
STNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Scorpio Tankers Inc. reported a gross profit of 192.73M and revenue of 312.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.
CF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 746.00M and revenue of 1.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.6%.
STNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Scorpio Tankers Inc. reported an operating income of 153.59M and revenue of 312.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.1%.
CF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.00M and revenue of 1.99B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
STNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Scorpio Tankers Inc. reported a net income of 216.26M and revenue of 312.86M, resulting in a net margin of 69.1%.
CF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 615.00M and revenue of 1.99B, resulting in a net margin of 31.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STNG and CF have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STNG has higher volatility (12.53%) compared to CF (8.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STNG dropped -91.13% vs CF's -76.73%.
STNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STNG and CF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer