PortfoliosLab logo
CF vs. STLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CF and STLD is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CF vs. STLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) and Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CF:

0.66

STLD:

-0.17

Sortino Ratio

CF:

0.93

STLD:

-0.00

Omega Ratio

CF:

1.13

STLD:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

CF:

0.46

STLD:

-0.24

Martin Ratio

CF:

1.57

STLD:

-0.49

Ulcer Index

CF:

11.53%

STLD:

14.13%

Daily Std Dev

CF:

31.63%

STLD:

37.98%

Max Drawdown

CF:

-76.73%

STLD:

-87.05%

Current Drawdown

CF:

-18.48%

STLD:

-19.60%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CF:

$14.70B

STLD:

$18.58B

EPS

CF:

$7.61

STLD:

$7.48

PE Ratio

CF:

11.92

STLD:

16.45

PEG Ratio

CF:

0.62

STLD:

10.91

PS Ratio

CF:

2.40

STLD:

1.08

PB Ratio

CF:

3.07

STLD:

2.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

CF:

$6.13B

STLD:

$17.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CF:

$2.22B

STLD:

$2.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

CF:

$2.20B

STLD:

$2.03B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CF achieves a 7.60% return, which is significantly lower than STLD's 8.33% return. Over the past 10 years, CF has underperformed STLD with an annualized return of 6.56%, while STLD has yielded a comparatively higher 21.16% annualized return.


CF

YTD

7.60%

1M

14.60%

6M

2.39%

1Y

16.54%

3Y*

-0.65%

5Y*

28.23%

10Y*

6.56%

STLD

YTD

8.33%

1M

-5.55%

6M

-14.59%

1Y

-6.64%

3Y*

14.75%

5Y*

38.48%

10Y*

21.16%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CF Industries Holdings, Inc.

Steel Dynamics, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CF vs. STLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CF is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CF is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CF is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CF is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CF is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CF is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

STLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of STLD is 3838
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of STLD is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of STLD is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of STLD is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of STLD is 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of STLD is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CF vs. STLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) and Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CF Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the STLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CF and STLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CF vs. STLD - Dividend Comparison

CF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than STLD's 1.53% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CF
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
2.20%2.34%2.01%1.76%1.70%3.10%2.51%2.76%2.82%3.81%2.94%1.83%
STLD
Steel Dynamics, Inc.
1.53%1.61%1.44%1.39%1.68%2.71%2.82%2.50%1.44%1.57%3.09%2.33%

Drawdowns

CF vs. STLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CF drawdown since its inception was -76.73%, smaller than the maximum STLD drawdown of -87.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CF and STLD.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CF vs. STLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) is 6.72%, while Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) has a volatility of 8.96%. This indicates that CF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CF vs. STLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CF Industries Holdings, Inc. and Steel Dynamics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
1.66B
4.37B
(CF) Total Revenue
(STLD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CF vs. STLD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CF Industries Holdings, Inc. and Steel Dynamics, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
34.4%
11.1%
(CF) Gross Margin
(STLD) Gross Margin
CF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 572.00M and revenue of 1.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.4%.

STLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Steel Dynamics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 486.54M and revenue of 4.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.1%.

CF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.00M and revenue of 1.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.

STLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Steel Dynamics, Inc. reported an operating income of 275.14M and revenue of 4.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.3%.

CF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 312.00M and revenue of 1.66B, resulting in a net margin of 18.8%.

STLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Steel Dynamics, Inc. reported a net income of 217.15M and revenue of 4.37B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.