PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STNG vs. WMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

STNG vs. WMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) and The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STNG achieves a 64.13% return, which is significantly higher than WMB's 26.51% return. Over the past 10 years, STNG has underperformed WMB with an annualized return of 8.64%, while WMB has yielded a comparatively higher 19.32% annualized return.


STNG

1D
2.32%
1M
3.42%
YTD
64.13%
6M
62.91%
1Y
97.51%
3Y*
26.69%
5Y*
32.05%
10Y*
8.64%

WMB

1D
2.50%
1M
-3.78%
YTD
26.51%
6M
29.07%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
40.23%
5Y*
28.66%
10Y*
19.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STNG vs. WMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
64.13%6.03%-16.29%15.40%325.48%17.40%-70.74%127.09%-41.26%-31.93%
WMB
The Williams Companies, Inc.
26.51%14.91%62.35%11.86%32.83%38.36%-8.20%14.18%-23.88%2.02%

Correlation

The correlation between STNG and WMB is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2010

0.31

The correlation between STNG and WMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

STNG:

$4.12B

WMB:

$91.66B

EPS

STNG:

$10.24

WMB:

$2.28

PE Ratio

STNG:

8.05

WMB:

32.81

PEG Ratio

STNG:

0.06

WMB:

1.70

PS Ratio

STNG:

3.90

WMB:

7.68

PB Ratio

STNG:

1.21

WMB:

7.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

STNG:

$1.04B

WMB:

$11.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

STNG:

$536.91M

WMB:

$7.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

STNG:

$590.06M

WMB:

$6.88B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STNG vs. WMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STNG
STNG Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
STNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
STNG Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
STNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
STNG Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

WMB
WMB Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
WMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMB Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
WMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STNG vs. WMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) and The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STNGWMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.22

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

2.26

+2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.71

4.70

+7.01

STNG vs. WMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STNG Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the WMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STNG and WMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STNG vs. WMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STNG drawdown since its inception was -91.13%, smaller than the maximum WMB drawdown of -98.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STNG and WMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STNGWMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.13%

-98.03%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.74%

-12.36%

-10.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.97%

-12.36%

-48.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.97%

-23.01%

-37.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.67%

-68.08%

-13.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.50%

-4.91%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.27%

-27.06%

-22.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.38%

5.94%

+2.44%

Volatility

STNG vs. WMB - Volatility Comparison

Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) has a higher volatility of 8.68% compared to The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) at 7.27%. This indicates that STNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STNGWMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.68%

7.27%

+1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.79%

15.77%

+12.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.06%

23.12%

+14.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.02%

23.59%

+21.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.31%

30.84%

+23.47%

Dividends

STNG vs. WMB - Dividend Comparison

STNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than WMB's 2.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
2.09%3.19%3.22%1.73%0.74%3.12%3.57%1.02%2.27%1.31%11.04%6.17%
WMB
The Williams Companies, Inc.
2.74%3.33%3.51%5.14%5.17%6.30%7.98%6.41%6.17%3.94%5.39%9.53%

Financials

STNG vs. WMB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Scorpio Tankers Inc. and The Williams Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
312.86M
3.03B
(STNG) Total Revenue
(WMB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

STNG vs. WMB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Scorpio Tankers Inc. and The Williams Companies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
61.6%
82.1%
Portfolio components
STNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Scorpio Tankers Inc. reported a gross profit of 192.73M and revenue of 312.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.

WMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.49B and revenue of 3.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.1%.

STNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Scorpio Tankers Inc. reported an operating income of 153.59M and revenue of 312.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.1%.

WMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.32B and revenue of 3.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 43.6%.

STNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Scorpio Tankers Inc. reported a net income of 216.26M and revenue of 312.86M, resulting in a net margin of 69.1%.

WMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 865.00M and revenue of 3.03B, resulting in a net margin of 28.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


STNG and WMB have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STNG has higher volatility (8.68%) compared to WMB (7.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STNG dropped -91.13% vs WMB's -98.03%.

STNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STNG and WMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer