STNG vs. WMB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) and The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB).

Performance

STNG vs. WMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) and The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

STNG vs. WMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
STNG Scorpio Tankers Inc.	47.73%	6.03%	-16.29%	15.40%	325.48%	17.40%	-70.74%	127.09%	-41.26%	-31.93%
WMB The Williams Companies, Inc.	21.95%	14.91%	62.35%	11.86%	32.83%	38.36%	-8.20%	14.18%	-23.88%	2.02%

Fundamentals

Market Cap STNG : $3.69B WMB : $88.94B
EPS STNG : $7.06 WMB : $2.14
PE Ratio STNG : 10.57 WMB : 33.97
PEG Ratio STNG : 0.08 WMB : 1.76
PS Ratio STNG : 3.88 WMB : 7.45
PB Ratio STNG : 1.15 WMB : 6.96
Total Revenue (TTM) STNG : $938.22M WMB : $11.94B
Gross Profit (TTM) STNG : $477.08M WMB : $6.83B
EBITDA (TTM) STNG : $492.91M WMB : $7.41B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STNG achieves a 47.73% return, which is significantly higher than WMB's 21.95% return. Over the past 10 years, STNG has underperformed WMB with an annualized return of 5.51%, while WMB has yielded a comparatively higher 23.08% annualized return.

STNG

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: -5.05%
• YTD: 47.73%
• 6M: 34.89%
• 1Y: 105.03%
• 3Y*: 12.92%
• 5Y*: 35.15%
• 10Y*: 5.51%

WMB

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: -1.90%
• YTD: 21.95%
• 6M: 16.67%
• 1Y: 25.78%
• 3Y*: 40.30%
• 5Y*: 31.00%
• 10Y*: 23.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

STNG vs. WMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STNG

STNG Risk / Return Rank: 92
STNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
STNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
STNG Omega Ratio Rank: 90
STNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
STNG Martin Ratio Rank: 92

WMB

WMB Risk / Return Rank: 74
WMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
WMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
WMB Omega Ratio Rank: 68
WMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
WMB Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STNG vs. WMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) and The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	STNG	WMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.46	1.05	+1.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	1.44	+1.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.20	+0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.45	2.18	+2.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.33	4.69	+7.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

STNG vs. WMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STNG Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the WMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STNG and WMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	STNG	WMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.46	1.05	+1.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	1.33	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10	0.73	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.01	0.23	-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between STNG and WMB is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

STNG vs. WMB - Dividend Comparison

STNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than WMB's 2.78% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
STNG Scorpio Tankers Inc.	2.24%	3.19%	3.22%	1.73%	0.74%	3.12%	3.57%	1.02%	2.27%	1.31%	11.04%	6.17%
WMB The Williams Companies, Inc.	2.78%	3.33%	3.51%	5.14%	5.17%	6.30%	7.98%	6.41%	6.17%	3.94%	5.39%	9.53%

Drawdowns

STNG vs. WMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STNG drawdown since its inception was -91.13%, smaller than the maximum WMB drawdown of -98.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STNG and WMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	STNG	WMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.13%	-98.03%	+6.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.74%	-12.36%	-10.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.97%	-23.01%	-37.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-84.57%	-68.08%	-16.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.04%	-3.88%	-10.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.83%	-27.17%	-22.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.21%	5.75%	+2.46%

Volatility

STNG vs. WMB - Volatility Comparison

Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) has a higher volatility of 14.83% compared to The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) at 5.10%. This indicates that STNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STNG	WMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.83%	5.10%	+9.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.17%	16.36%	+10.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.99%	24.70%	+18.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.65%	23.40%	+22.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.47%	31.62%	+22.85%

Financials

STNG vs. WMB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Scorpio Tankers Inc. and The Williams Companies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

STNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Scorpio Tankers Inc. reported a gross profit of 167.24M and revenue of 252.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.2%.

WMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.50B and revenue of 3.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.8%.

STNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Scorpio Tankers Inc. reported an operating income of 133.06M and revenue of 252.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.7%.

WMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 3.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.9%.

STNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Scorpio Tankers Inc. reported a net income of 128.12M and revenue of 252.65M, resulting in a net margin of 50.7%.

WMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 734.00M and revenue of 3.20B, resulting in a net margin of 23.0%.