PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CF vs. BHP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CFBHP
YTD Return1.29%-15.31%
1Y Return16.71%0.71%
3Y Return (Ann)20.14%0.64%
5Y Return (Ann)14.95%9.66%
10Y Return (Ann)8.04%5.18%
Sharpe Ratio0.500.07
Daily Std Dev29.06%25.69%
Max Drawdown-76.73%-75.95%
Current Drawdown-30.29%-16.02%

Fundamentals


CFBHP
Market Cap$14.92B$147.17B
EPS$7.87$2.91
PE Ratio10.1019.97
PEG Ratio0.640.00
Revenue (TTM)$6.63B$55.66B
Gross Profit (TTM)$5.86B$43.24B
EBITDA (TTM)$3.13B$26.85B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between CF and BHP is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CF vs. BHP - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CF achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly higher than BHP's -15.31% return. Over the past 10 years, CF has outperformed BHP with an annualized return of 8.04%, while BHP has yielded a comparatively lower 5.18% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%1,000.00%2,000.00%3,000.00%4,000.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
3,337.61%
352.10%
CF
BHP

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CF Industries Holdings, Inc.

BHP Group

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CF vs. BHP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) and BHP Group (BHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CF, currently valued at 0.50, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.50
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CF, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.91
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CF, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CF, currently valued at 0.30, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.30
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CF, currently valued at 1.91, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.91
BHP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BHP, currently valued at 0.07, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.07
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BHP, currently valued at 0.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.30
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BHP, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.03
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BHP, currently valued at 0.09, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.09
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BHP, currently valued at 0.20, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.20

CF vs. BHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CF Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is higher than the BHP Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CF and BHP.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
0.50
0.07
CF
BHP

Dividends

CF vs. BHP - Dividend Comparison

CF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than BHP's 5.39% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CF
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
2.13%2.01%1.76%1.70%3.10%2.51%2.76%2.82%3.81%2.94%1.83%0.94%
BHP
BHP Group
5.39%4.98%10.27%9.98%3.67%8.59%4.89%3.61%1.68%9.32%5.11%3.40%

Drawdowns

CF vs. BHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CF drawdown since its inception was -76.73%, roughly equal to the maximum BHP drawdown of -75.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CF and BHP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-30.29%
-16.02%
CF
BHP

Volatility

CF vs. BHP - Volatility Comparison

CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) has a higher volatility of 9.08% compared to BHP Group (BHP) at 8.03%. This indicates that CF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
9.08%
8.03%
CF
BHP

Financials

CF vs. BHP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CF Industries Holdings, Inc. and BHP Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items