CF vs. BHP
CF (CF Industries Holdings, Inc.) and BHP (BHP Group Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — CF in Agricultural Inputs, BHP in Other Industrial Metals & Mining. Over the past 10 years, CF returned 18.27%/yr vs 22.02%/yr for BHP. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CF vs. BHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CF achieves a 35.22% return, which is significantly lower than BHP's 44.89% return. Over the past 10 years, CF has underperformed BHP with an annualized return of 18.27%, while BHP has yielded a comparatively higher 22.02% annualized return.
CF
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -14.87%
- YTD
- 35.22%
- 6M
- 35.06%
- 1Y
- 5.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.29%
- 5Y*
- 17.65%
- 10Y*
- 18.27%
BHP
- 1D
- -2.38%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 44.89%
- 6M
- 43.93%
- 1Y
- 93.76%
- 3Y*
- 18.56%
- 5Y*
- 16.27%
- 10Y*
- 22.02%
CF vs. BHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CF CF Industries Holdings, Inc. | 35.22% | -7.17% | 10.08% | -4.75% | 22.29% | 87.18% | -15.76% | 12.73% | 5.13% | 40.24% |
BHP BHP Group Limited | 44.89% | 28.91% | -24.64% | 16.50% | 44.34% | 0.91% | 25.37% | 24.50% | 10.55% | 33.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between CF and BHP is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2005 | 0.41 |
The correlation between CF and BHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CF:
$16.01B
BHP:
$218.27B
CF:
$11.08
BHP:
$8.51
CF:
9.35
BHP:
10.08
CF:
0.15
BHP:
2.79
CF:
2.22
BHP:
2.03
CF:
1.94
BHP:
4.33
CF:
$7.41B
BHP:
$107.64B
CF:
$2.99B
BHP:
$89.04B
CF:
$2.60B
BHP:
$52.23B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CF vs. BHP — Risk / Return Rank
CF
BHP
CF vs. BHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) and BHP Group Limited (BHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CF | BHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.43 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 4.76 | -4.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.43 | 17.65 | -17.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CF vs. BHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CF drawdown since its inception was -76.73%, roughly equal to the maximum BHP drawdown of -76.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CF and BHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CF | BHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.73% | -76.22% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.89% | -19.80% | -5.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.16% | -37.21% | +8.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.36% | -37.21% | -11.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.74% | -44.29% | -16.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.40% | -7.91% | -16.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.92% | -21.27% | -3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.51% | 5.33% | +8.18% |
Volatility
CF vs. BHP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) is 8.86%, while BHP Group Limited (BHP) has a volatility of 12.86%. This indicates that CF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CF | BHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.86% | 12.86% | -4.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.53% | 27.00% | +8.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.86% | 32.37% | +9.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.13% | 32.40% | +5.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.31% | 32.32% | +7.99% |
Dividends
CF vs. BHP - Dividend Comparison
CF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than BHP's 3.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BHP BHP Group Limited | 3.10% | 3.64% | 5.98% | 4.98% | 22.44% | 9.98% | 3.67% | 8.59% | 4.89% | 3.61% | 1.68% | 9.38% |
CF CF Industries Holdings, Inc. | 1.93% | 2.59% | 2.34% | 2.01% | 1.76% | 1.70% | 3.10% | 2.51% | 2.76% | 2.82% | 3.81% | 2.94% |
Financials
CF vs. BHP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CF Industries Holdings, Inc. and BHP Group Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CF vs. BHP - Profitability Comparison
CF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 746.00M and revenue of 1.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.6%.
BHP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group Limited reported a gross profit of 11.98B and revenue of 27.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.9%.
CF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.00M and revenue of 1.99B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
BHP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group Limited reported an operating income of 11.98B and revenue of 27.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.9%.
CF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 615.00M and revenue of 1.99B, resulting in a net margin of 31.0%.
BHP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group Limited reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 27.95B, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CF and BHP have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BHP has higher volatility (12.86%) compared to CF (8.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CF dropped -76.73% vs BHP's -76.22%.
BHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CF and BHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer