STNG vs. ASC
STNG (Scorpio Tankers Inc.) and ASC (Ardmore Shipping Corporation) are both stocks. STNG operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while ASC operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, STNG returned 8.64%/yr vs 11.68%/yr for ASC. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
STNG vs. ASC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STNG achieves a 64.13% return, which is significantly lower than ASC's 70.76% return. Over the past 10 years, STNG has underperformed ASC with an annualized return of 8.64%, while ASC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.68% annualized return.
STNG
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- 64.13%
- 6M
- 62.91%
- 1Y
- 97.51%
- 3Y*
- 26.69%
- 5Y*
- 32.05%
- 10Y*
- 8.64%
ASC
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- -4.50%
- YTD
- 70.76%
- 6M
- 67.60%
- 1Y
- 81.06%
- 3Y*
- 17.38%
- 5Y*
- 38.41%
- 10Y*
- 11.68%
STNG vs. ASC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STNG Scorpio Tankers Inc. | 64.13% | 6.03% | -16.29% | 15.40% | 325.48% | 17.40% | -70.74% | 127.09% | -41.26% | -31.93% |
ASC Ardmore Shipping Corporation | 70.76% | -10.36% | -8.18% | 5.81% | 326.33% | 3.36% | -63.57% | 93.79% | -41.63% | 8.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between STNG and ASC is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2013 | 0.57 |
The correlation between STNG and ASC shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
STNG:
$4.12B
ASC:
$717.46M
STNG:
$10.24
ASC:
$1.43
STNG:
8.05
ASC:
12.27
STNG:
0.06
ASC:
0.02
STNG:
3.90
ASC:
2.21
STNG:
1.21
ASC:
1.10
STNG:
$1.04B
ASC:
$324.12M
STNG:
$536.91M
ASC:
$100.44M
STNG:
$590.06M
ASC:
$105.80M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STNG vs. ASC — Risk / Return Rank
STNG
ASC
STNG vs. ASC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) and Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STNG | ASC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.34 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.31 | 3.71 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.71 | 8.98 | +2.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STNG vs. ASC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STNG drawdown since its inception was -91.13%, which is greater than ASC's maximum drawdown of -80.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STNG and ASC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STNG | ASC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.13% | -80.11% | -11.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.74% | -21.96% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.97% | -61.41% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.97% | -61.41% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.67% | -71.21% | -10.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.50% | -16.39% | +11.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.27% | -38.91% | -10.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.38% | 9.06% | -0.68% |
Volatility
STNG vs. ASC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) is 8.68%, while Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) has a volatility of 11.20%. This indicates that STNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STNG | ASC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.68% | 11.20% | -2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.79% | 27.22% | +0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.06% | 36.00% | +2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.02% | 45.77% | -0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.31% | 51.29% | +3.02% |
Dividends
STNG vs. ASC - Dividend Comparison
STNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than ASC's 3.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASC Ardmore Shipping Corporation | 3.70% | 2.83% | 8.89% | 8.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.41% | 4.80% |
STNG Scorpio Tankers Inc. | 2.09% | 3.19% | 3.22% | 1.73% | 0.74% | 3.12% | 3.57% | 1.02% | 2.27% | 1.31% | 11.04% | 6.17% |
Financials
STNG vs. ASC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Scorpio Tankers Inc. and Ardmore Shipping Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STNG vs. ASC - Profitability Comparison
STNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Scorpio Tankers Inc. reported a gross profit of 192.73M and revenue of 312.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.
ASC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ardmore Shipping Corporation reported a gross profit of 32.00M and revenue of 87.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.4%.
STNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Scorpio Tankers Inc. reported an operating income of 153.59M and revenue of 312.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.1%.
ASC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ardmore Shipping Corporation reported an operating income of 25.58M and revenue of 87.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.1%.
STNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Scorpio Tankers Inc. reported a net income of 216.26M and revenue of 312.86M, resulting in a net margin of 69.1%.
ASC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ardmore Shipping Corporation reported a net income of 23.58M and revenue of 87.92M, resulting in a net margin of 26.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STNG and ASC have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASC has higher volatility (11.20%) compared to STNG (8.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STNG dropped -91.13% vs ASC's -80.11%.
STNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STNG and ASC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer