PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STNC vs. CCOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

STNC vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

STNC vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
STNC
Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF
2.48%10.33%8.92%11.49%-13.10%17.77%
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
-0.34%3.52%-5.70%-11.92%2.51%9.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STNC achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's -0.34% return.


STNC

1D
2.42%
1M
-5.86%
YTD
2.48%
6M
5.01%
1Y
15.05%
3Y*
9.39%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*

CCOR

1D
0.65%
1M
-4.07%
YTD
-0.34%
6M
0.35%
1Y
-1.48%
3Y*
-3.32%
5Y*
-0.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


STNC vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

STNC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

STNC vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STNC
STNC Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
STNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
STNC Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
STNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
STNC Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

CCOR
CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STNC vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STNCCCORDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

-0.14

+1.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.34

-0.14

+1.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.98

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

-0.19

+1.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.53

-0.35

+5.88

STNC vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STNC Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STNC and CCOR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STNCCCORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

-0.14

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

-0.08

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.15

+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between STNC and CCOR is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

STNC vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

STNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than CCOR's 1.07% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
STNC
Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF
0.99%1.02%0.96%0.08%0.58%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
1.07%1.07%1.18%1.21%1.11%1.02%1.50%0.73%1.53%0.89%

Drawdowns

STNC vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STNC drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, roughly equal to the maximum CCOR drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STNC and CCOR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


STNCCCORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.33%

-22.99%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.13%

-9.17%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.33%

-22.99%

+0.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.86%

-17.23%

+11.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.06%

-7.07%

+1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

4.95%

-2.02%

Volatility

STNC vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 2.17%. This indicates that STNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


STNCCCORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.58%

2.17%

+3.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

5.44%

+4.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.16%

10.74%

+6.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.35%

11.13%

+4.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.33%

10.81%

+4.52%