STNC vs. BDGS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

STNC (Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STNC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Red Gate Advisers LLC, while BDGS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Bridges. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, STNC returned 12.63%/yr vs 14.06%/yr for BDGS. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

STNC vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STNC achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 5.64% return.

STNC

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 3.49%
• YTD: 9.57%
• 6M: 11.33%
• 1Y: 20.51%
• 3Y*: 12.63%
• 5Y*: 7.71%
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 1.26%
• YTD: 5.64%
• 6M: 5.65%
• 1Y: 13.85%
• 3Y*: 14.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STNC vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
STNC Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF	9.57%	10.33%	8.92%	7.47%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	5.64%	10.61%	19.07%	8.31%

Correlation

The correlation between STNC and BDGS is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2023	0.55

The correlation between STNC and BDGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.55 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

STNC vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	STNC	BDGS
Consumer Cyclical	19.9%	10.9%
Technology	19.9%	37.4%
Healthcare	13.8%	7.5%
Industrials	12.0%	6.6%
Consumer Defensive	8.5%	4.1%
Communication Services	7.9%	16.6%
Financial Services	6.3%	9.3%
Utilities	4.8%	1.9%
Basic Materials	4.1%	1.5%
Real Estate	2.9%	1.5%
Energy	-	2.6%

Return for Risk

STNC vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STNC

STNC Risk / Return Rank: 47
STNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
STNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
STNC Omega Ratio Rank: 41
STNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
STNC Martin Ratio Rank: 52

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 74
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STNC vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	STNC	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	2.29	-0.77
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	3.40	-1.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.47	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	3.45	-0.90
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.78	16.47	-7.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

STNC vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STNC Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STNC and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	STNC	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	2.29	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	1.76	-1.23

Drawdowns

STNC vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STNC drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STNC and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	STNC	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.33%	-9.12%	-13.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.09%	-4.03%	-4.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.90%	-9.12%	-8.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.08%	-0.83%	-0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.92%	-0.64%	-5.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.34%	0.84%	+1.50%

Volatility

STNC vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 1.14%. This indicates that STNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STNC	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.15%	1.14%	+4.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.47%	4.74%	+5.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.57%	6.08%	+7.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.53%	8.21%	+7.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.39%	8.21%	+7.18%

STNC vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both STNC and BDGS have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

STNC vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

STNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than BDGS's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.52%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%
STNC Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF	0.93%	1.02%	0.96%	0.08%	0.58%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STNC and BDGS in my portfolio?

STNC and BDGS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STNC or BDGS?

STNC has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to BDGS (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STNC dropped -22.33% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

Which ETF is better, STNC or BDGS?

On 3-year performance, BDGS leads with 14.06% vs 12.63% for STNC. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, BDGS has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, STNC or BDGS?

Over the 3-year period, BDGS has performed better with a 14.06% return vs 12.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, STNC or BDGS?

STNC and BDGS have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STNC or BDGS?

STNC has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.52% for BDGS.

What is the main difference between STNC and BDGS?

STNC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BDGS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Red Gate Advisers LLC and Bridges.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BDGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.