PortfoliosLab logo
STNC vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between STNC and BDGS is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

STNC vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

STNC:

0.40

BDGS:

1.49

Sortino Ratio

STNC:

0.62

BDGS:

2.34

Omega Ratio

STNC:

1.08

BDGS:

1.43

Calmar Ratio

STNC:

0.34

BDGS:

1.86

Martin Ratio

STNC:

1.19

BDGS:

8.69

Ulcer Index

STNC:

5.13%

BDGS:

1.95%

Daily Std Dev

STNC:

17.22%

BDGS:

11.54%

Max Drawdown

STNC:

-22.33%

BDGS:

-9.12%

Current Drawdown

STNC:

-5.83%

BDGS:

-0.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STNC achieves a -0.12% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's 2.08% return.


STNC

YTD

-0.12%

1M

4.26%

6M

-5.83%

1Y

5.32%

3Y*

6.76%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BDGS

YTD

2.08%

1M

1.96%

6M

2.66%

1Y

16.98%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Bridges Capital Tactical ETF

STNC vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both STNC and BDGS have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

STNC vs. BDGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STNC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of STNC is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of STNC is 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of STNC is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of STNC is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of STNC is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of STNC is 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

BDGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDGS is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDGS is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

STNC vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current STNC Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STNC and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

STNC vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

STNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than BDGS's 1.77% yield.


TTM2024202320222021
STNC
Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF
0.96%0.96%0.08%0.58%0.41%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
1.77%1.81%0.84%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

STNC vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STNC drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STNC and BDGS.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

STNC vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 1.23%. This indicates that STNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...