STNC vs. IWY
STNC (Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF) and IWY (iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. STNC is actively managed, while IWY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, STNC returned 7.71%/yr vs 16.45%/yr for IWY. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STNC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWY.
Performance
STNC vs. IWY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STNC achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly higher than IWY's 7.20% return.
STNC
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 3.49%
- YTD
- 9.57%
- 6M
- 11.33%
- 1Y
- 20.51%
- 3Y*
- 12.63%
- 5Y*
- 7.71%
- 10Y*
- —
IWY
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 5.83%
- YTD
- 7.20%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- 1Y
- 26.69%
- 3Y*
- 25.47%
- 5Y*
- 16.45%
- 10Y*
- 19.57%
STNC vs. IWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STNC Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF | 9.57% | 10.33% | 8.92% | 11.49% | -13.10% | 17.77% |
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 7.20% | 18.19% | 34.89% | 46.49% | -29.91% | 29.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between STNC and IWY is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2021 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, the correlation between STNC and IWY has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
STNC vs. IWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STNC
IWY
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Financial Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
STNC
IWY
Technology
STNC
IWY
Healthcare
STNC
IWY
Industrials
STNC
IWY
Consumer Defensive
STNC
IWY
Communication Services
STNC
IWY
Financial Services
STNC
IWY
Utilities
STNC
IWY
Basic Materials
STNC
IWY
Real Estate
STNC
IWY
Energy
STNC
-
IWY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STNC vs. IWY — Risk / Return Rank
STNC
IWY
STNC vs. IWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STNC | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.30 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 1.61 | +0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.78 | 5.26 | +3.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STNC | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 1.73 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.77 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.92 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
STNC vs. IWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STNC drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, smaller than the maximum IWY drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STNC and IWY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STNC | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.33% | -32.68% | +10.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.09% | -16.63% | +8.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.90% | -23.22% | +5.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.33% | -32.68% | +10.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -1.82% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.92% | -4.75% | -1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 5.09% | -2.75% |
Volatility
STNC vs. IWY - Volatility Comparison
Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) at 3.69%. This indicates that STNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STNC | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.15% | 3.69% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.47% | 11.65% | -1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 15.54% | -1.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 21.48% | -5.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 20.97% | -5.58% |
STNC vs. IWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
STNC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IWY's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
STNC vs. IWY - Dividend Comparison
STNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than IWY's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.36% | 0.42% | 0.68% | 0.88% | 0.50% | 0.71% | 1.06% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.58% |
STNC Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF | 0.93% | 1.02% | 0.96% | 0.08% | 0.58% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STNC and IWY have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STNC has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to IWY (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STNC dropped -22.33% vs IWY's -32.68%.
On 5-year performance, IWY leads with 16.45% vs 7.71% for STNC. On fees, IWY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, IWY has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IWY has performed better with a 16.45% return vs 7.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for STNC.
STNC has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.33% for IWY.
They also come from different issuers: Red Gate Advisers LLC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for STNC and 0.20% for IWY.
IWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STNC and IWY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer