PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STNC vs. IWY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STNC vs. IWY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STNC achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly higher than IWY's 7.20% return.


STNC

1D
0.53%
1M
3.49%
YTD
9.57%
6M
11.33%
1Y
20.51%
3Y*
12.63%
5Y*
7.71%
10Y*

IWY

1D
-1.41%
1M
5.83%
YTD
7.20%
6M
6.65%
1Y
26.69%
3Y*
25.47%
5Y*
16.45%
10Y*
19.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STNC vs. IWY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
STNC
Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF
9.57%10.33%8.92%11.49%-13.10%17.77%
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
7.20%18.19%34.89%46.49%-29.91%29.46%

Correlation

The correlation between STNC and IWY is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2021

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between STNC and IWY has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

STNC vs. IWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
STNC
IWY

Consumer Cyclical

19.9%
11.4%

Technology

19.9%
54.9%

Healthcare

13.8%
6.6%

Industrials

12.0%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
3.0%

Communication Services

7.9%
13.9%

Financial Services

6.3%
5.6%

Utilities

4.8%
1.1%

Basic Materials

4.1%
0.3%

Real Estate

2.9%
0.3%

Energy

-

0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

STNC
19.9%
IWY
11.4%

Technology

STNC
19.9%
IWY
54.9%

Healthcare

STNC
13.8%
IWY
6.6%

Industrials

STNC
12.0%
IWY
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

STNC
8.5%
IWY
3.0%

Communication Services

STNC
7.9%
IWY
13.9%

Financial Services

STNC
6.3%
IWY
5.6%

Utilities

STNC
4.8%
IWY
1.1%

Basic Materials

STNC
4.1%
IWY
0.3%

Real Estate

STNC
2.9%
IWY
0.3%

Energy

STNC

-

IWY
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STNC vs. IWY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STNC
STNC Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
STNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
STNC Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
STNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
STNC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

IWY
IWY Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWY Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWY Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STNC vs. IWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STNCIWYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.30

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

1.61

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.78

5.26

+3.52

STNC vs. IWY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STNC Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the IWY Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STNC and IWY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STNCIWYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

1.73

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.77

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.92

-0.39

Drawdowns

STNC vs. IWY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STNC drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, smaller than the maximum IWY drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STNC and IWY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STNCIWYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.33%

-32.68%

+10.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.09%

-16.63%

+8.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.90%

-23.22%

+5.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.33%

-32.68%

+10.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-1.82%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.92%

-4.75%

-1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

5.09%

-2.75%

Volatility

STNC vs. IWY - Volatility Comparison

Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) at 3.69%. This indicates that STNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STNCIWYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

3.69%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

11.65%

-1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.57%

15.54%

-1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.53%

21.48%

-5.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.39%

20.97%

-5.58%

STNC vs. IWY - Expense Ratio Comparison

STNC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IWY's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

STNC vs. IWY - Dividend Comparison

STNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than IWY's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
0.33%0.36%0.42%0.68%0.88%0.50%0.71%1.06%1.32%1.26%1.51%1.58%
STNC
Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF
0.93%1.02%0.96%0.08%0.58%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


STNC and IWY have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STNC has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to IWY (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STNC dropped -22.33% vs IWY's -32.68%.

On 5-year performance, IWY leads with 16.45% vs 7.71% for STNC. On fees, IWY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, IWY has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IWY has performed better with a 16.45% return vs 7.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for STNC.

STNC has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.33% for IWY.

They also come from different issuers: Red Gate Advisers LLC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for STNC and 0.20% for IWY.

IWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STNC and IWY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer