PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STM vs. FLKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STM vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STM achieves a 176.58% return, which is significantly higher than FLKR's 88.17% return.


STM

1D
0.10%
1M
-8.42%
6M
148.77%
YTD
176.58%
1Y
123.79%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
29.42%

FLKR

1D
-0.13%
1M
-5.67%
6M
69.24%
YTD
88.17%
1Y
153.09%
3Y*
45.44%
5Y*
17.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STM vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STM
STMicroelectronics N.V.
176.58%5.28%-49.67%41.66%-26.76%32.39%38.91%96.34%-35.65%-10.90%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
88.17%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-7.54%42.64%8.88%-21.30%3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between STM and FLKR is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.54

The correlation between STM and FLKR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STM vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STM
STM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
STM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
STM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
STM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
STM Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STM vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STMFLKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.47

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

6.61

-3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.35

20.76

-13.42

STM vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STM Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STM and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STM vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STM drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STM and FLKR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STMFLKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.40%

-50.06%

-44.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.35%

-23.03%

-13.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.66%

-26.39%

-40.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.66%

-48.14%

-18.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.47%

-16.53%

+6.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.08%

-21.93%

-33.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.12%

7.32%

+8.80%

Volatility

STM vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) is 22.31%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 24.66%. This indicates that STM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STMFLKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.31%

24.66%

-2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.40%

46.71%

-2.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.14%

49.65%

+6.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.82%

30.98%

+14.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.53%

29.12%

+15.41%

Dividends

STM vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

STM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than FLKR's 2.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
2.45%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%0.00%0.00%
STM
STMicroelectronics N.V.
0.50%1.39%1.32%0.48%0.67%0.45%0.50%0.89%1.73%0.98%2.10%5.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


STM and FLKR have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLKR has higher volatility (24.66%) compared to STM (22.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STM dropped -94.40% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STM and FLKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer