STM vs. CDNS
Compare and contrast key facts about STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: STM or CDNS.
Correlation
The correlation between STM and CDNS is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
STM vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
STM:
-1.29
CDNS:
0.27
STM:
-1.96
CDNS:
0.64
STM:
0.77
CDNS:
1.08
STM:
-0.91
CDNS:
0.38
STM:
-1.59
CDNS:
0.81
STM:
31.13%
CDNS:
11.51%
STM:
38.41%
CDNS:
34.86%
STM:
-94.40%
CDNS:
-93.13%
STM:
-54.26%
CDNS:
-8.16%
Fundamentals
STM:
$23.24B
CDNS:
$85.39B
STM:
$2.43
CDNS:
$3.79
STM:
10.65
CDNS:
82.15
STM:
19.08
CDNS:
3.29
STM:
$14.23B
CDNS:
$4.35B
STM:
$5.92B
CDNS:
$3.91B
STM:
$4.10B
CDNS:
$1.49B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STM achieves a -50.65% return, which is significantly lower than CDNS's 10.10% return. Over the past 10 years, STM has underperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 13.98%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively higher 31.87% annualized return.
STM
-50.65%
0.13%
-39.27%
-49.60%
-1.13%
13.98%
CDNS
10.10%
0.08%
-5.86%
10.74%
33.83%
31.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
STM vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
STM vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison
STM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, while CDNS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 1.35% | 0.48% | 0.82% | 0.45% | 0.50% | 0.86% | 1.47% | 0.93% | 2.10% | 5.11% | 4.55% | 4.25% |
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
STM vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STM drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, roughly equal to the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STM and CDNS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
STM vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) is 7.98%, while Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) has a volatility of 9.91%. This indicates that STM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
STM vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between STMicroelectronics N.V. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities