STM vs. CDNS
Compare and contrast key facts about STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS).
Performance
STM vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
STM vs. CDNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 33.57% | 5.28% | -49.67% | 41.66% | -26.76% | 32.39% | 38.91% | 96.34% | -35.65% | 94.77% |
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | -11.10% | 4.03% | 10.31% | 69.55% | -13.80% | 36.59% | 96.70% | 59.52% | 3.97% | 65.82% |
Fundamentals
STM:
$30.75B
CDNS:
$75.84B
STM:
$0.28
CDNS:
$4.06
STM:
123.52
CDNS:
68.49
STM:
2.63
CDNS:
14.34
STM:
1.72
CDNS:
10.67
STM:
$11.84B
CDNS:
$5.30B
STM:
$4.01B
CDNS:
$5.09B
STM:
$2.41B
CDNS:
$1.74B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STM achieves a 33.57% return, which is significantly higher than CDNS's -11.10% return. Over the past 10 years, STM has underperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 21.41%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively higher 27.94% annualized return.
STM
- 1D
- 10.31%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- YTD
- 33.57%
- 6M
- 23.02%
- 1Y
- 59.31%
- 3Y*
- -12.68%
- 5Y*
- -1.74%
- 10Y*
- 21.41%
CDNS
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- -7.81%
- YTD
- -11.10%
- 6M
- -20.89%
- 1Y
- 9.26%
- 3Y*
- 9.77%
- 5Y*
- 14.45%
- 10Y*
- 27.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STM vs. CDNS — Risk / Return Rank
STM
CDNS
STM vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STM | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 0.23 | +0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 0.63 | +1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.08 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 0.29 | +1.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.60 | 0.65 | +2.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STM | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 0.23 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.41 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.84 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.22 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between STM and CDNS is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
STM vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison
STM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while CDNS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 1.04% | 1.39% | 1.32% | 0.48% | 0.67% | 0.45% | 0.50% | 0.89% | 1.73% | 0.98% | 2.10% | 5.11% |
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
STM vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STM drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, roughly equal to the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STM and CDNS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| STM | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.40% | -93.13% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.35% | -28.09% | -8.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.66% | -29.59% | -37.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.66% | -32.12% | -34.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.41% | -25.58% | -8.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.49% | -39.79% | -15.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.08% | 12.61% | +3.47% |
Volatility
STM vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison
STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) has a higher volatility of 18.64% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 7.46%. This indicates that STM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| STM | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.64% | 7.46% | +11.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.35% | 25.41% | +9.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.35% | 39.60% | +15.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.15% | 35.27% | +7.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.64% | 33.43% | +10.21% |
Financials
STM vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between STMicroelectronics N.V. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities