PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
STM vs. HUBS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between STM and HUBS is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

STM vs. HUBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) and HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

500.00%1,000.00%1,500.00%2,000.00%2,500.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
211.26%
1,653.46%
STM
HUBS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

STM:

-1.20

HUBS:

-0.34

Sortino Ratio

STM:

-1.86

HUBS:

-0.22

Omega Ratio

STM:

0.77

HUBS:

0.97

Calmar Ratio

STM:

-0.83

HUBS:

-0.29

Martin Ratio

STM:

-1.54

HUBS:

-0.75

Ulcer Index

STM:

34.30%

HUBS:

18.04%

Daily Std Dev

STM:

43.97%

HUBS:

39.73%

Max Drawdown

STM:

-94.40%

HUBS:

-69.95%

Current Drawdown

STM:

-63.38%

HUBS:

-38.06%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

STM:

$19.23B

HUBS:

$27.53B

EPS

STM:

$1.66

HUBS:

$0.11

PE Ratio

STM:

11.77

HUBS:

4.80K

PEG Ratio

STM:

1.67

HUBS:

0.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

STM:

$9.81B

HUBS:

$2.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

STM:

$3.78B

HUBS:

$1.71B

EBITDA (TTM)

STM:

$2.49B

HUBS:

$99.34M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STM achieves a -21.50% return, which is significantly higher than HUBS's -24.25% return. Over the past 10 years, STM has underperformed HUBS with an annualized return of 9.16%, while HUBS has yielded a comparatively higher 29.75% annualized return.


STM

YTD

-21.50%

1M

-17.95%

6M

-30.34%

1Y

-53.50%

5Y*

1.06%

10Y*

9.16%

HUBS

YTD

-24.25%

1M

-23.19%

6M

2.00%

1Y

-15.78%

5Y*

36.18%

10Y*

29.75%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

STM vs. HUBS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of STM is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of STM is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of STM is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of STM is 66
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of STM is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of STM is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

HUBS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HUBS is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HUBS is 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HUBS is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HUBS is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HUBS is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HUBS is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

STM vs. HUBS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) and HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for STM, currently valued at -1.20, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
STM: -1.20
HUBS: -0.34
The chart of Sortino ratio for STM, currently valued at -1.86, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
STM: -1.86
HUBS: -0.22
The chart of Omega ratio for STM, currently valued at 0.77, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
STM: 0.77
HUBS: 0.97
The chart of Calmar ratio for STM, currently valued at -0.83, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
STM: -0.83
HUBS: -0.29
The chart of Martin ratio for STM, currently valued at -1.54, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
STM: -1.54
HUBS: -0.75

The current STM Sharpe Ratio is -1.20, which is lower than the HUBS Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STM and HUBS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.50-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-1.20
-0.34
STM
HUBS

Dividends

STM vs. HUBS - Dividend Comparison

STM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, while HUBS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
STM
STMicroelectronics N.V.
1.84%1.32%0.48%0.82%0.45%0.50%0.86%1.47%0.93%2.10%5.11%4.55%
HUBS
HubSpot, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

STM vs. HUBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STM drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, which is greater than HUBS's maximum drawdown of -69.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STM and HUBS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-63.38%
-38.06%
STM
HUBS

Volatility

STM vs. HUBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) is 15.23%, while HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) has a volatility of 17.68%. This indicates that STM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
15.23%
17.68%
STM
HUBS

Financials

STM vs. HUBS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between STMicroelectronics N.V. and HubSpot, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab