STM vs. HUBS
Compare and contrast key facts about STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) and HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: STM or HUBS.
Correlation
The correlation between STM and HUBS is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
STM vs. HUBS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
STM:
-1.09
HUBS:
0.73
STM:
-1.55
HUBS:
1.20
STM:
0.81
HUBS:
1.15
STM:
-0.78
HUBS:
0.56
STM:
-1.39
HUBS:
1.63
STM:
30.75%
HUBS:
16.18%
STM:
39.18%
HUBS:
35.97%
STM:
-94.40%
HUBS:
-69.95%
STM:
-53.95%
HUBS:
-16.78%
Fundamentals
STM:
$22.13B
HUBS:
$36.61B
STM:
$2.43
HUBS:
-$0.50
STM:
19.08
HUBS:
3.40
STM:
$9.95B
HUBS:
$1.92B
STM:
$3.97B
HUBS:
$1.63B
STM:
$2.63B
HUBS:
$86.91M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STM achieves a -1.28% return, which is significantly lower than HUBS's 1.78% return. Over the past 10 years, STM has underperformed HUBS with an annualized return of 13.91%, while HUBS has yielded a comparatively higher 35.88% annualized return.
STM
-1.28%
-3.94%
-39.62%
-42.81%
-1.75%
13.91%
HUBS
1.78%
-5.06%
47.63%
25.37%
31.44%
35.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
STM vs. HUBS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
STM
HUBS
STM vs. HUBS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) and HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
STM vs. HUBS - Dividend Comparison
STM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, while HUBS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 1.34% | 1.32% | 0.48% | 0.82% | 0.45% | 0.50% | 0.86% | 1.47% | 0.93% | 2.10% | 5.11% | 4.55% |
HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
STM vs. HUBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STM drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, which is greater than HUBS's maximum drawdown of -69.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STM and HUBS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
STM vs. HUBS - Volatility Comparison
STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) has a higher volatility of 11.67% compared to HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) at 7.73%. This indicates that STM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
STM vs. HUBS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between STMicroelectronics N.V. and HubSpot, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities