STLG vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
STLG and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. STLG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell US Large Cap Factors Growth Style Index. It was launched on Jan 14, 2020. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both STLG and SCHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: STLG or SCHG.
Correlation
The correlation between STLG and SCHG is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
STLG vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
STLG:
2.10
SCHG:
2.22
STLG:
2.73
SCHG:
2.86
STLG:
1.38
SCHG:
1.40
STLG:
2.92
SCHG:
3.13
STLG:
11.00
SCHG:
12.34
STLG:
3.57%
SCHG:
3.14%
STLG:
18.72%
SCHG:
17.45%
STLG:
-31.34%
SCHG:
-34.59%
STLG:
-3.60%
SCHG:
-2.75%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with STLG having a 38.21% return and SCHG slightly lower at 37.04%.
STLG
38.21%
2.42%
9.68%
37.94%
N/A
N/A
SCHG
37.04%
3.40%
12.88%
37.14%
20.24%
16.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
STLG vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
STLG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
STLG vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
STLG vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
STLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than SCHG's 0.41% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF | 0.21% | 0.21% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
STLG vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STLG drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLG and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
STLG vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) has a higher volatility of 5.91% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.07%. This indicates that STLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.