STLG vs. QINT
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) and American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT).
STLG and QINT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. STLG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell US Large Cap Factors Growth Style Index. It was launched on Jan 14, 2020. QINT is a passively managed fund by American Century Investments that tracks the performance of the Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index. It was launched on Sep 10, 2018. Both STLG and QINT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: STLG or QINT.
Correlation
The correlation between STLG and QINT is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
STLG vs. QINT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
STLG:
0.53
QINT:
0.80
STLG:
0.90
QINT:
1.21
STLG:
1.13
QINT:
1.17
STLG:
0.59
QINT:
1.01
STLG:
2.09
QINT:
3.79
STLG:
6.77%
QINT:
3.63%
STLG:
26.63%
QINT:
17.27%
STLG:
-31.34%
QINT:
-33.84%
STLG:
-12.59%
QINT:
-0.59%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STLG achieves a -7.96% return, which is significantly lower than QINT's 11.90% return.
STLG
-7.96%
-1.50%
-3.25%
13.44%
17.97%
N/A
QINT
11.90%
1.34%
8.50%
13.78%
11.99%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
STLG vs. QINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
STLG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QINT's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
STLG vs. QINT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
STLG
QINT
STLG vs. QINT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) and American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
STLG vs. QINT - Dividend Comparison
STLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than QINT's 3.12% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF | 0.23% | 0.22% | 0.09% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 3.12% | 3.49% | 3.12% | 3.56% | 2.30% | 1.61% | 1.83% | 0.42% |
Drawdowns
STLG vs. QINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STLG drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum QINT drawdown of -33.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLG and QINT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
STLG vs. QINT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) has a higher volatility of 17.50% compared to American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) at 11.47%. This indicates that STLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.