PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STLG vs. VRAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STLG vs. VRAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) and Virtus Real Asset Income ETF (VRAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with STLG having a 19.46% return and VRAI slightly higher at 19.54%.


STLG

1D
-0.10%
1M
3.81%
YTD
19.46%
6M
18.14%
1Y
42.17%
3Y*
32.04%
5Y*
19.14%
10Y*

VRAI

1D
0.36%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
19.54%
6M
20.53%
1Y
21.27%
3Y*
12.15%
5Y*
5.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STLG vs. VRAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
STLG
iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF
19.46%21.49%37.42%42.86%-26.75%27.99%26.51%
VRAI
Virtus Real Asset Income ETF
19.54%6.67%2.66%6.12%-9.96%24.35%-6.62%

Correlation

The correlation between STLG and VRAI is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between STLG and VRAI has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STLG vs. VRAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STLG
STLG Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
STLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
STLG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
STLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
STLG Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

VRAI
VRAI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VRAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRAI Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VRAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRAI Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STLG vs. VRAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) and Virtus Real Asset Income ETF (VRAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STLGVRAIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.31

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

4.43

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.06

13.70

-1.65

STLG vs. VRAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STLG Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the VRAI Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STLG and VRAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STLG vs. VRAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STLG drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum VRAI drawdown of -47.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLG and VRAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STLGVRAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-47.51%

+16.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.69%

-4.82%

-8.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

-16.89%

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.61%

-26.71%

-3.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.23%

-2.85%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-10.04%

+2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

1.57%

+1.94%

Volatility

STLG vs. VRAI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) has a higher volatility of 8.09% compared to Virtus Real Asset Income ETF (VRAI) at 3.23%. This indicates that STLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STLGVRAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.09%

3.23%

+4.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.32%

8.36%

+6.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.04%

12.00%

+7.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.18%

16.61%

+5.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.96%

22.08%

+1.88%

STLG vs. VRAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

STLG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than VRAI's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

STLG vs. VRAI - Dividend Comparison

STLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than VRAI's 2.93% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
STLG
iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF
0.27%0.31%0.38%0.75%1.85%0.67%0.75%0.00%
VRAI
Virtus Real Asset Income ETF
2.93%4.68%7.13%5.02%4.48%3.34%3.91%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


STLG and VRAI have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STLG has higher volatility (8.09%) compared to VRAI (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STLG dropped -31.34% vs VRAI's -47.51%.

On 5-year performance, STLG leads with 19.14% vs 5.59% for VRAI. On fees, STLG is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, VRAI has been the lower-risk option at 3.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, STLG has performed better with a 19.14% return vs 5.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STLG is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for VRAI.

VRAI has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 0.27% for STLG.

STLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VRAI is REIT. STLG tracks Russell US Large Cap Factors Growth Style Index, while VRAI tracks Indxx Real Asset Income Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for STLG and 0.55% for VRAI.

STLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STLG and VRAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer