STLG vs. PBUS
STLG (iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF) and PBUS (Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - STLG tracks the Russell US Large Cap Factors Growth Style Index while PBUS tracks the MSCI USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, STLG returned 20.26%/yr vs 13.48%/yr for PBUS. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. STLG charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for PBUS.
Performance
STLG vs. PBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STLG achieves a 21.29% return, which is significantly higher than PBUS's 10.82% return.
STLG
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 11.92%
- YTD
- 21.29%
- 6M
- 21.80%
- 1Y
- 43.57%
- 3Y*
- 33.60%
- 5Y*
- 20.26%
- 10Y*
- —
PBUS
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- —
STLG vs. PBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF | 21.29% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 10.82% | 17.58% | 24.99% | 27.33% | -19.64% | 26.77% | 18.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between STLG and PBUS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between STLG and PBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
STLG vs. PBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STLG
PBUS
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
STLG
PBUS
Consumer Cyclical
STLG
PBUS
Healthcare
STLG
PBUS
Communication Services
STLG
PBUS
Industrials
STLG
PBUS
Consumer Defensive
STLG
PBUS
Financial Services
STLG
PBUS
Utilities
STLG
PBUS
Energy
STLG
PBUS
Basic Materials
STLG
PBUS
Real Estate
STLG
PBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STLG vs. PBUS — Risk / Return Rank
STLG
PBUS
STLG vs. PBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STLG | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.41 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 3.08 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.85 | 13.93 | -1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STLG | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 2.30 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.80 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.80 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
STLG vs. PBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STLG drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum PBUS drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLG and PBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STLG | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -33.15% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.69% | -9.02% | -4.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.73% | -19.07% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.61% | -25.40% | -5.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -0.64% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.36% | -5.13% | -2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 1.99% | +1.41% |
Volatility
STLG vs. PBUS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) at 2.94%. This indicates that STLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STLG | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.03% | 2.94% | +2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.89% | 9.13% | +4.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.89% | 12.06% | +5.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 17.05% | +4.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.89% | 19.33% | +4.56% |
STLG vs. PBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
STLG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PBUS's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
STLG vs. PBUS - Dividend Comparison
STLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than PBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 0.98% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 0.98% | 1.35% | 1.53% | 2.33% | 0.50% |
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, STLG and PBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
STLG has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to PBUS (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STLG dropped -31.34% vs PBUS's -33.15%.
On 5-year performance, STLG leads with 20.26% vs 13.48% for PBUS. On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, STLG has performed better with a 20.26% return vs 13.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for STLG.
PBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.25% for STLG.
STLG tracks Russell US Large Cap Factors Growth Style Index, while PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for STLG and 0.04% for PBUS.
STLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STLG and PBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer